Does CRISPR cause unintended mutations? Not in this monkey study

monkeys

CRISPR is still new, and no one really knows its potential side effects. Does it cause cancer? How about unintended mutations? To get to the bottom of the issue, a team of researchers from China conducted a comprehensive assessment of CRISPR-modified monkeys, looking for any off-target mutations in the animals’ genomes.

For their study, the researchers designed a CRISPR-Cas9 system to make the gene MCPH1 inactive in rhesus monkeys. Mutations in this gene cause the brain to develop abnormally, resulting in the medical condition microcephaly.

The researchers injected their CRISPR-Cas9 system into 15 rhesus monkey zygotes (the single cell produced when sperm fertilizes an egg). They found that the MCPH1 knockout was successful in 13 of the resulting embryos (the next gestation stage, when the cell begins dividing and growing). This showed them their technique worked as they hoped.

Related article:  Base Editing: New CRISPR technique could improve ability to safely edit human embryos

The researchers found that their CRISPR gene modification worked in all but one of the monkey offspring, including the deceased female. Next, they looked for any de novo mutations (DNM), mutations that aren’t inherited, in the monkeys. They sequenced the whole genomes of each monkey and found that their CRISPR edits produced no DNMs.

The researchers’ conclusion? “CRISPR-Cas9 can be considered a relatively safe gene editing system for primates,” according to their paper.

Read full, original post: CRISPR Doesn’t Cause Unintended Mutations in Monkeys, Study Finds

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
Nigeriacotton

Video: We can ‘finally’ grow GMOs—Nigerian farmer explains why developing countries need biotech crops

Nigerian farmer Patience Koku discusses the GMO crop trials she is conducting on her farm, and why growers can "rise ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
breastfeeding bed x facebook x

Infographic: We know breastfeeding helps children. Now we know it helps mothers too

When a woman becomes pregnant, her risk of type 2 diabetes increases for the rest of her life, perhaps because ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...
gmo corn field x

Do GMO Bt (insect-resistant) crops pose a threat to human health or the environment?

Bt is a bacterium found organically in the soil. It is extremely effective in repelling or killing target insects but ...
favicon

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend