‘Young blood’ plasma treatments unproven, possibly dangerous, says FDA

2-20-2019 c f b eb b e
Image credit: Joern Pollex

Federal health regulators on [February 19] warned consumers against controversial “young blood” treatments — plasma infusions from young donors marketed for conditions such as Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, multiple sclerosis and post-traumatic stress disorder.

“There is no proven clinical benefit of infusion of plasma from young donors to cure, mitigate, treat, or prevent these conditions, and there are risks associated with the use of any plasma product,” [said FDA commissioner] Scott Gottlieb.

Plasma is the liquid portion of the blood and contains proteins that help blood to clot. It’s used to replace low levels of blood proteins in a range of medical situations. For example, some patients with liver disease are unable to make the proteins required for blood to clot.

Clinics have been springing up that offer young-donor plasma infusions as a rejuvenating, “anti-aging” therapy. The FDA statement did not name any specific company; it was accompanied by a safety communication designed to inform consumers. But the agency warned it will consider taking enforcement action — such as sending warning letters demanding corrective actions — against companies that “abuse the trust of patients and endanger their health with uncontrolled manufacturing conditions.”

Read full, original post: FDA warns consumers against ‘young blood’ plasma infusions for dementia, PTSD and other conditions

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-04-13-at-1.39.26-PM
Viewpoint: ‘Safer for children?’ Stonyfield yogurt under fire for deceptive organic marketing
Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-10.46.29-AM
Viewpoint: How to counter science disinformation? Science journalist offers 12 practical tips
ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-12_16_37-PM-2
Viewpoint: Are cancer rates ‘skyrocketing’ as RFK, Jr. and MAHA claim? The evidence says mostly the opposite
Picture1-14
When superbugs threaten vulnerable children: Can AI help solve antibiotic resistance?
Screenshot-2026-04-23-at-11.00.36-AM
Regulators' dilemma: Thalidomide, Metformin, and the cost of getting drug approvals wrong
ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-08_39_41-PM
GLP podcast: Big Pharma, Big Ag, Big Food—health harming industries or life-saving innovators?
Picture1-1
Cooling the planet with balloons: Could a geoengineering gamble slow global warming?
ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-12_32_36-PM
Viewpoint: The state of U.S. vaccine policy? Dismal nationally, but some states are stepping up.
png-pill-omega-Supp-fish-oil
Millions take omega-3 fish oil for brain health. New research suggests it may do the opposite.
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.