Farm groups push USDA oversight of gene-edited animals, potentially sparking new regulatory battle with FDA

Screen Shot at PM
Gene-edited cows don't grow horns, sparing them painful horn removal procedure.

Livestock groups are aggressively pushing for regulation of the budding sector of gene-edited animals to be moved from FDA to USDA, potentially setting up another jurisdictional battle between the two agencies.

The industry argues that FDA is too slow in its review of animals created via biotechnology, and that USDA is better positioned to take on the issue because of its experience regulating genetically engineered plants. It points out that just a single species has been approved by FDA — GE salmon — after a lengthy review that lasted more than 20 years.

Industry insiders told POLITICO they’re frustrated by the lack of clarity from FDA about how biotech animals are regulated, which they say has discouraged developers from seeking approval for new types of animals with tweaked DNA.

Related article:  Podcast: Where did GMOs come from? The fascinating history of genetic engineering

Under the agency’s current framework, these animals are regulated as a “drug” as outlined by the Food and Drug Act….That logic applied to animal biotechnology, however, would mean that farms would be considered drug manufacturing centers if the operations raised genetically engineered livestock.

Proponents of biotechnology acknowledge that another obstacle stands in the way of getting these products to market: public perception.

Read full, original article: Livestock groups want USDA to handle regulations of gene-edited animals (Behind paywall)

Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped

Video: We can ‘finally’ grow GMOs—Nigerian farmer explains why developing countries need biotech crops

Nigerian farmer Patience Koku discusses the GMO crop trials she is conducting on her farm, and why growers can "rise ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
breastfeeding bed x facebook x

Infographic: We know breastfeeding helps children. Now we know it helps mothers too

When a woman becomes pregnant, her risk of type 2 diabetes increases for the rest of her life, perhaps because ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...
gmo corn field x

Do GMO Bt (insect-resistant) crops pose a threat to human health or the environment?

Bt is a bacterium found organically in the soil. It is extremely effective in repelling or killing target insects but ...

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend