Genetic tests by Inova draw warning letter from FDA, citing potential for ‘serious health consequences’

lab

A suite of genetic tests used to predict a personโ€™s response to specific medications is being marketed illegally by its manufacturer, Inova Genomics Laboratory, as the tests arenโ€™t backed by scientific data, alleges the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

The FDA sent a warning letter to Inova [April 4], advising the Virginia-based medical firm to refrain from marketing a suite of genetic tests that have yet to receive the regulatorโ€™s approval for safety and effectiveness. The tests include MediMap ADHD, MediMap Mind, MediMap Plus, MediMap Heart, and MediMap Babyโ€”offerings collectively known as the MediMap tests. These products, called pharmacogenetic tests, use a personโ€™s genetic variants to predict their response to certain drugs.

Gizmodo reached out to Inova for comment and will update this article when we hear back.

In an FDA statement … the agency said no scientific data exists to show that โ€œInovaโ€™s tests can help patients or health care providers make appropriate treatment decisions for the listed drugs.โ€ This could lead to โ€œpotentially serious health consequences for patients,โ€ the FDA wrote. …

Indeed, this is some serious stuff. If people are changing or avoiding certain medications based on unproven genetic tests, thatโ€™s obviously very bad.

 

Read full, original post: FDA Warns Virginia Lab for Illegally Marketing Unproven Genetic Tests

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Jun-9-2026-01_11_37-PM
Turmeric supplements: More risks than benefits
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpointโ€”โ€œMiracle moleculeโ€ debunked: Why acemannan supplements donโ€™t work
wuhan institute of virology main entrance
โ€‹โ€‹COVID lab leak? Making a case that the Wuhan market origins theory is wrong
Screenshot-2026-06-05-at-2.12.30-PM
Some plants can poison you. So how did humans figure out what is safe to eat?
Screenshot-2026-06-17-at-9.44.03-AM
Viewpoint: Embryos are becoming the newest battleground of love, loss, and legal uncertainty
ChatGPT Image May 26, 2026, 08_42_17 AM (1)
Viewpoint: Greenpeace and poison: How environmental advocacy groups rely on compliant (and often ignorant) journalists to spread disinformation and spark litigation
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-14-2026-09_41_44-AM-2
Viewpointโ€”โ€˜The gleeful efficiency of an arsonistโ€™: Administrationโ€™s health and science research cuts are โ€˜sabotagingโ€™ Americaโ€™s future
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-11-2026-01_15_03-PM
Selective Pressure, Selective Silence

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.