The GLP is committed to full transparency. Download and review our just-released 2019 Annual Report.

As IARC glyphosate-cancer finding draws more scrutiny, WHO rebukes agency for ‘undermining’ other UN chemical safety assessments

| | May 7, 2019

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) was once a serious, revered organization with the somber task of tackling what environmental factors caused what cancers so that we could eliminate them …. But …. in the 2000s, with no more carcinogens to find, IARC began to subtly manufacture them.

If an epidemiologist tells you a chemical in Scotch will harm you, you will be alarmed, but if a …. toxicologist corrects them and notes it would take 10,000 shots of Scotch all at once to cause that harm, you will be annoyed.

Yet that is what IARC now does in every monograph. They completely ignore [dose], except in their media kits for journalists, where they mention “risk” dozens of times.

Related article:  Farm group moves to permanently block California's Prop. 65 glyphosate-cancer warning labels

WHO has had enough. They have told IARC to stop reviewing compounds that have already been cleared by scientists with the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) or FAO/WHO Joint Meeting on Pesticide Residues (JMPR). They [asked] ….  member countries to “exercise appropriate oversight to “ensure that the IARC would not duplicate and undermine the work of JMPR and JECFA on chemicals in food.”

Read full, original article: FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius Meeting Suggests Rogue Activist Group IARC Be Reined In

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion, and analysis. Click the link above to read the full, original article.
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.

Send this to a friend