Navigating the evolving privacy pitfalls of consumer genetic testing

4-30-2019 cm genetic privacy feat
Image: Image Point FR/Shutterstock

While DNA testing was once only the stuff of crime investigations and television shows, it is now available to the masses.

You may not care if anyone knows that your results turned up Ashkenazi Jewish and Polish ancestry. But what if your results show that you carry the BRCA 1/BRCA 2 gene variants, aka the breast cancer genes? A few years ago, Angelina Jolie publicly opted for a mastectomy, simply because her genetic makeup made her more likely than average to develop breast cancer. You might not take such a drastic measure, but you might use the information to make some important lifestyle changes. That’s a good outcome. But what could an insurance company do with that information? What if it could use that information to determine your insurability and premium cost? What if a drug company got that information to send you targeted marketing? Those things you may care about.

If you do think about submitting a sample, you may want to read the fine print you usually would just gloss over and reread it periodically to make sure you are comfortable with any changes.

Read full, original post: Ancestry, genetic DNA testing – what’s privacy got to do with it?

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-03-13-at-12.14.04-PM
The FDA wants to make many popular prescription drugs OTC—a great idea. Here’s why it’s unlikely to happen
Screenshot-2026-04-20-at-2.26.27-PM
Viewpoint — Food-fear world: The latest activist scientists campaign: Cancer-causing additives
Screenshot-2026-05-04-at-12.54.32-PM
How Utah became the country’s supplement capital  — and a haven for unregulated, ineffective and fake products
Screenshot-PM-24
Viewpoint: The herbicide glyphosate isn’t perfect. Banning it would be far worse.
images
The never-ending GMO debate: Pros and cons
Screenshot-2026-05-01-at-11.56.24-AM
‘Science moves forward when people are willing to think differently’: Memories of DNA maverick Craig Venter
Screenshot-2026-04-30-at-2.19.37-PM
5 myths about summer dehydration that could damage your health — or even kill you
Screenshot-2026-04-03-at-11.15.51-AM
Paraben panic: How a flawed study, media hype, and chemophobia convinced the public of the danger of one of the safest classes of preservatives
79d03212-2508-45d0-b427-8e9743ff6432
Viewpoint: The Casey Means hustle—Wellness woo opportunism dressed up as medical wisdom
bigstock opioids on chalkboard with rol
GLP podcast: 'Safe injection sites': enabling drug addiction or saving lives?
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.