The GLP is committed to full transparency. Download and review our Annual Report.

Should your dog eat ‘paleo’ kibble? How misleading pet food labels fool consumers

| | September 4, 2019

Zealotry about pet food is every bit as self-satisfied as a Food Babe mantra. Since food is the new religion, and pets are the new kids, the new angels and demons must be different ingredients in pet foods. Ask a chihuahua owner in the pet store why they’re reaching for a $40 bag of kibble with a painting of a wolf eating a caribou, and they’ll usually say, “Because it’s biologically appropriate“

But let’s just say for sake of argument that Paleo for poodles were better for dogs (it’s not). If that were true (and again, it’s not), can you wriggle your self-righteous nose knowing that you’ve given Mrs. Fluffybutt the finest tundra ungulate* meat available?

Related article:  Bacterial gene found in CRISPR-edited cow DNA raises new regulatory hurdles for animal gene editing

Well no, and not just because your premise is wrong. The problem is a little-talked-about issue in pet food known as mislabeling.

Most pet food labeling is simply not very helpful. The front of the package labeling is often woefully misguiding, and most pet owners aren’t aware of what they should be looking for. There’s little guarantee that the ingredients listed are an accurate representation of the food in the bag, even though mislabeling pet food is a federal crime.

Read full, original article: Pet Food Mislabeling: Let Food Be Thy Dogma

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion, and analysis. Click the link above to read the full, original article.
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.

Send this to a friend