Burkina Faso ‘farmer of the year’ calls for return of Bt cotton

BF Sofitex main banner x
Wiledio Naboho, the 2019 Alliance for Science Farmer of the Year, is mounting fresh pressure on the Burkina Faso government to permit the re-introduction of genetically modified (Bt) cotton.

The 2015 decision to halt cultivation of the GM variety due to concerns about fiber length is causing farmers to suffer as incomes continue to decline and pesticide pollution increases, Naboho said.

“We are passing through a lot of difficulties… You have to spend more money buying the pesticides. And also, when you are doing this [pesticide] treatment of your cotton farm, your health is in danger,” Naboho said.

“You have to use more money. You have to also use more people [paid labor for pesticide application] if you want to have a big land. And at the end of the day, when you sit down and make your calculation, you may come and see that you didn’t get more money,” he said.

“As a farmer, what I have seen through the Bt cotton when we were farming is it reduced the use of the pesticides that I was talking about, and it protect also the environment. Farmers don’t know how to use the pesticides, and we have seen the damage,” he added.

Pest attack on cotton is considered the biggest threat to its production all over the world. The bollworm — cotton’s most destructive pest — has the capacity to cause up to 90 percent yield loss. In West Africa, 25 to 35 percent of all cotton is lost to these pests.

In 2008, Burkina Faso became the first West African country to commercialize GM cotton with inherent resistance to the bollworm pest through the Bt gene. Farmers were able to dramatically reduce their use of pesticides, going from spraying their conventional cotton fields 15 times per season to control bollworm to spraying only twice with Bt cotton.

Bt cotton became hugely popular and by 2014, more than 70 percent of all cultivated cotton in Burkina Faso was GM. But cotton companies expressed concern the length of fiber from the new variety was shorter than regular and they were having difficulty getting premium prices on the international market. They thus suspended its production in 2016.

Naboho said farmers are paying the price for that decision with their health and money. “As a farmer, I know the suffering that we are passing through. It’s not easy. You can go in the villages. Right now, I’m in the village farming. You can see how farmers are suffering. So for that, if they can do something, it may be helpful for others because the benefit (of Bt cotton), everybody knows it,” he said.

Related article:  Talking Biotech: Is genetic engineering the best way to resuscitate the American chestnut from blight?

During its production, Bt cotton helped cut down on the use of pesticides by up to 70 percent, cotton yield increased by about 22 percent and farmers’ income increased by an average of 51 percent, according to a national household survey. The consequences of the withdrawal have been dire not only for farmers, but also for the country’s economy, where cotton accounts for 70 percent of its exports. The nation recently lost its position and pride as Africa’s largest producer of the commodity to Mali.

The cotton companies are excited about the return of premium prices following the phase out of Bt cotton, but the farmers are not happy. “Most of my brothers and sisters that are working hard under the sun, they are suffering,” Naboho said. “The rain is beating them. At the end of the day, they don’t get anything. And people sit in their offices making decision. We have to be very careful and hear from people.”

Farmers across the country have previously made similar demands of Burkina Faso’s cotton buying companies, asking them to re-consider the decision to suspend the growing of Bt cotton.

In response, Wilfried A. Yameogo, director general of SOFITEX, the government backed company that buys an estimated 80 percent of all cotton produced in the West African nation, disclosed in 2018 that negotiations had begun to allow for a return of Bt cotton. But that promise is yet to materialize and the farmers are displeased.

In Burkina Faso, the majority of farmers engage in mixed cropping so they can produce food to feed their families as well as cash crops. Naboho, for example, grows maize, cowpea and other vegetables. He said farmers need access to other genetically modified crops, apart from cotton.

“So, it’s not only Bt cotton that we need. We need other crops like maize. We heard about TELA, [drought-tolerant, insect-resistant maize]. It may be helpful for us farmers in Burkina Faso. We heard about [vitamin A-fortified] Golden Rice. Other things [need] to get into our country for farmers.”

This article originally ran at the Cornell Alliance for Science and has been republished here with permission. Follow the Alliance for Science on Twitter @ScienceAlly

Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

As Europe sees record coronavirus cases and deaths, Slovakia is testing its entire adult population. WSJ's Drew Hinshaw explains how ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend