Podcast: Beepocalypse debunked; Ban CRISPR babies? Anti-science views slow COVID-19 herd immunity

crispr babies
This article or excerpt is included in the GLP’s daily curated selection of ideologically diverse news, opinion and analysis of biotechnology innovation.

Some experts are calling for a ban on embryo gene editing after a “disaster” experiment resulted in potentially dangerous and unintended genetic changes. Rapidly spreading anti-science views may be slowing our ability to achieve herd immunity for COVID-19 and needlessly extending the pandemic. Are bees responsible for 1/3 of the food we reproduce, and are they in jeopardy thanks to pesticides?

Join geneticist Kevin Folta and GLP editor Cameron English on this episode of Science Facts and Fallacies as they break down these latest news stories:

human embryo editing

A botched experiment to edit the DNA of human embryos has prompted calls for researchers to “stay the living daylights away from embryo editing.” Using donated embryos and CRISPR gene editing, scientists at the Francis Crick Institute in London deleted a gene to better understand its role in early human develop, then compared the edited embryos to their unedited counterparts. The experiment worked, sort of. Embryos with the targeted edit also displayed unexpected mutations that could have led to birth defects and even cancer later in life, had they been used to start a pregnancy.

The concerning results have intensified calls to restrict embryo gene-editing research from some experts, who say the technology is nowhere near ready to be used safely. The situation raises difficult questions bioethicists, scientists and the public have to answer. If we overregulate embryo gene-editing research, will the technology ever be ready for commercial use, for example to correct inherited disorders? And if it eventually can be used safely, would we be able to stop governments and rogue scientists from using germline editing without proper oversight?

protest ap er hpmain x
Credit: Elaine Thompson/AP

A June CNN poll found that roughly 1/3 of Americans won’t get a COVID-19 vaccine if and when it becomes available. Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, attributed the skepticism to widespread “anti-science, anti-authority, anti-vaccine feeling” in the US, perpetuated by a well-organized vaccine skepticism movement. Critics may push back, pointing to the  constantly changing information governments and scientists have released about the novel coronavirus.  Are the skeptics justified in denying the safety and efficacy of a COVID-19 vaccine?

Bees pollinate 1/3 of the food produced today, but their populations are rapidly declining due to the use of dangerous pesticides in agriculture. The mainstream press and environmental activist groups have made such pronouncements about bees for many years now. Fortunately, claims about an imminent bee apocalypse, and thus the instability of our food supply, are not supported by the science.

Related article:  Glyphosate is no bee killer

Subscribe to the Science Facts and Fallacies Podcast on iTunes and Spotify.

Kevin M. Folta is a professor in the Horticultural Sciences Department at the University of Florida. Follow Professor Folta on Twitter @kevinfolta

Cameron J. English is the GLP’s senior agricultural genetics and special projects editor. BIO. Follow him on Twitter @camjenglish

The GLP featured this article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis. The viewpoint is the author’s own. The GLP’s goal is to stimulate constructive discourse on challenging science issues.

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
sperm swim

Video: Sperm are ‘spinners not swimmers’—because they are lopsided

Research by fertility scientists in the UK and Mexico challenges the accepted view of how sperm “swim”, suggesting that it ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
breastfeeding bed x facebook x

Infographic: We know breastfeeding helps children. Now we know it helps mothers too

When a woman becomes pregnant, her risk of type 2 diabetes increases for the rest of her life, perhaps because ...
biotechnology worker x

Can GMOs rescue threatened plants and crops?

Some scientists and ecologists argue that humans are in the midst of an "extinction crisis" — the sixth wave of ...
food globe x

Are GMOs necessary to feed the world?

Experts estimate that agricultural production needs to roughly double in the coming decades. How can that be achieved? ...
eating gmo corn on the cob x

Are GMOs safe?

In 2015, 15 scientists and activists issued a statement, "No Scientific consensus on GMO safety," in the journal Environmental Sciences ...
Screen Shot at PM

Charles Benbrook: Agricultural economist and consultant for the organic industry and anti-biotechnology advocacy groups

Independent scientists rip Benbrook's co-authored commentary in New England Journal calling for reassessment of dangers of all GMO crops and herbicides ...
Screen Shot at PM

ETC Group: ‘Extreme’ biotechnology critic campaigns against synthetic biology and other forms of ‘extreme genetic engineering’

The ETC Group is an international environmental non-governmental organization (NGO) based in Canada whose stated purpose is to monitor "the impact of emerging technologies and ...
Share via
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend