Scientists taking partisan stands on the coronavirus: Here comes the political backlash

scientists for biden harris custom text blue sign rcacd ebc e b da a e d tyqv
Credit: Zazzle

Today, although most Americans trust information from physicians and medical scientists, public trust in the scientific community has become increasingly partisan, and conservatives and Republicans are less likely to hold positive views toward that community. As a counter to this, scientists ran for Congress in record numbers in the 2018 midterm elections, mostly on the Democratic side. Scientists are running again this year.

Mobilized science, however, is not without potential costs. When scientists advocate for their interests in an expressly political way, they risk further polarizing public opinion about research.

…

This raises an important question: what can be done to combat the politicization of science? One place to start is to further spark Americans’ interest in, and curiosity about, scientific research. Studies find that people who take an interest in science—irrespective of whether they consider themselves to be Democrats, Republicans or independents—are more likely to hold positive views toward the scientific community and support federal funding for scientific research.

Mis- and disinformation are distorting science and public policy. Subscribe to our Daily and Weekly Digests for incisive coverage of ‘disruptive’ innovations in AI, agricultural biotechnology, food, chemicals, nuclear energy, vaccines, and other disruptive innovations.

This means that while advocacy could come at a cost of further politicizing Americans’ views toward the scientific community, there are strategies scientists can follow to mitigate that effect. The potential benefits of mobilized science may well be worth it.

Read the original post

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-09-24-at-3.25.18-PM
No, organic eggs are not more nutritious or necessarily healthier than regular eggs. They are far more expensive.
Screenshot-2026-09-28-at-2.41.21-PM
Viewpoint: 7-OH controversy: An opioid is available over-the-counter–even at gas stations. Should we be concerned?
Screenshot-2026-09-17-at-1.07.08-PM
'We are dangerously addicted to antidepressants': Should we heed RFK Jr.’s sobering warning?
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-2-2026-02_03_32-PM
How much of a problem is AI’s water use?
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-25-2026-11_36_56-AM
Now AI almost started a war with China
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-22-2026-11_17_31-AM
The exploding controversy over AI’s built-in survival drive
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-25-2026-10_36_43-AM
New federal autism committee head has financial ties to leucovorin
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-25-2026-11_57_15-AM
RFK, Jr. likely violated federal ethics guidelines in accepting more than $4,275,000 in gifts and book advances from MAHA allies
Screenshot-2026-09-16-at-10.27.33-AM
Viewpoint: SCOTUS poised to address First Amendment tension between mandatory vaccines, children’s health and religious freedom 
Woman_Vaping_Electronic_Cigarette_50687233623
Trump administration clears the way for speedy approvals of once-restricted tobacco vapes and pouches
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-27-2026-10_00_17-AM
Current and future RFK Jr. aides criticize his science-rejectionist vaccine views
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.