Viewpoint: Scientific American article claiming pesticides harm beetles and earthworms is ‘more hype than substance’

Credit: Scott Bauer/USDA
Credit: Scott Bauer/USDA

I picked up a Scientific American that came last August and thumbed my way to page 12, where alarm bells rang. The two-page article was titled, Pesticides are Killing Our Soils. And the sub-title declared, “They harm worms, beetles and thousands of other vital subterranean species.”

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

When the word “pesticides” is used in Scientific American, it usually means bad hype for those of us who grow crops. That was the first alarm. The second was the word “vital.” Millions of acres of desert soils around the world lack earthworms and other invertebrates, and also a productive and diverse microbiome. Yet they produce fabulous crops when provided water and nutrients. Hydroponic farmers grow crops in gravel or other soilless (and microbiomeless) mediums.

So the word “vital” is hype.

That said, I don’t mean to imply that worms, beetles, and thousands of other subterranean species, plus a diverse supply of beneficial fungi and bacteria, are not good for a healthy, productive soil. The emphasis here is on beneficial, because the soil is not a benign, everybody-gets-along place. It’s a battleground, where every species vies for resources and space.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here.

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.noReviewsLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

organic scaled
Facts & Fallacies podcast: Organic food cuts pesticide exposure? A response to Dr. Rhonda Patrick
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
kratom
Viewpoint: Kratom ‘supplement’ crisis: DEA sits on its hands while patient addictions to this ineffective drug  rise
Screenshot 2026-07-22 at 10.25
Science brain drain escalates as Trump purge extends to USDA
using genetics to reverse aging
Is the longevity obsession a new form of ageism?
Blood blockage
High cholesterol? FDA approves effective oral medication
Screenshot-2026-07-01-at-2.49.48-PM
Dr. TikTok and male fertility: Viral claims tout GLP-1 drugs as fertility boosters. What does the science say?
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-02_53_56-PM
Embryo gene editing is on the horizon, stirring mixed emotions
a-mature-farmer-working-in-the-field-at-sunrise-harvesting-crops-generated-by-ai-photo
What’s the prospect of developing gene-altered crops that are more nutritious and resist climate disruption
Screenshot-2026-07-21-at-6.22.06-PM
The Indian physician’s one-woman battle against health disinformation on Wikipedia
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-6-2026-02_25_26-PM
40 million Americans take glucosamine. If you have memory loss, it could accelerate cognitive decline.
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
file-f-d-d-
Facts & Fallacies Podcast: Europe's AC debacle underscores fatal flaw in green activism
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.