What’s in our genes that explains why some lifelong smokers never get cancer?

Credit: Washington University School of Medicine
Credit: Washington University School of Medicine

Without a doubt, the safest way to protect yourself against lung cancer is to avoid smoking cigarettes, and yet, at the same time, it’s also true that not all lifelong smokers are doomed to develop cancer.

In fact, the vast majority don’t. Scientists have long wondered why, and a new study adds weight to the idea that genetics has a role to play.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

The findings suggest that DNA repair genes are more active among some individuals, which can protect against cancers arising, even when cigarettes are regularly smoked.

According to the authors, the findings “unequivocally demonstrate” that mutations in the human lung increase with natural age, and among smokers, the DNA damage is even more significant.

“However, the heaviest smokers did not have the highest mutation burden,” says [epidemiologist and pulmonologist Simon] Spivack. 

“Our data suggest that these individuals may have survived for so long in spite of their heavy smoking because they managed to suppress further mutation accumulation. This leveling off of mutations could stem from these people having very proficient systems for repairing DNA damage or detoxifying cigarette smoke.”

The findings could help explain why 80 to 90 percent of lifelong smokers never develop lung cancer. It could also help explain why some people who never smoke at all do develop the tumors.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT Image May 10, 2026, 08_16_59 PM 2
Overmedicalization? RFK Jr.’s antidepressant crackdown raises conflict questions over his fee stake in Wisner Baum, the tort firm built on suing drug makers
Picture1-5
Science Disinformation Gap: The transatlantic battle over social media and censorship
Screenshot-2026-05-08-at-3.40.33-PM
Seeds of power: China turns to genetic engineering to become global superpower
Picture1-14
When superbugs threaten vulnerable children: Can AI help solve antibiotic resistance?
S
As vaccine rejectionism spreads, measles may be taking a more dangerous turn
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-13-2026-02_20_22-PM
Viewpoint: Misinformation infodemic? Why assessing evidence is so challenging 
Screenshot 2026-05-08 at 3.01
Transforming farming and nutrition with AI and robotics? Larry Ellison’s half-billion-dollar Hawaii greenhouse dream goes bust
Screenshot-2026-05-01-at-1.29.41-PM
Viewpoint: What happens when whole grains meet modern food manufacturing? Labels don’t tell the whole story.
Farmers can talk to plants
Farmers are a major source of misinformation—about farming
Screenshot-2026-04-20-at-2.26.27-PM
Viewpoint — Food-fear world: The latest activist scientists campaign: Cancer-causing additives
ChatGPT-Image-May-8-2026-01_41_33-PM-3
Viewpoint: Surge of climate misinformation traced to right wing and anti-wind activists 
Screenshot-2026-03-13-at-12.14.04-PM
The FDA wants to make many popular prescription drugs OTC—a great idea. Here’s why it’s unlikely to happen
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-27-2026-11_47_30-AM-2
FDA’s expedited drug reviews are hailed in some quarters but other approval practices are problematic
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.