Viewpoint: Canadian government incentives to boost agricultural sustainability lags while billions are given away to high-tech ventures. Here’s why that needs to change

off farm photo copy
Credit: USDA

This federal government appears to look at almost every decision through a climate change lens.

For better or worse, Ottawa is determined to walk the walk when it comes to reducing damage caused by global warming.

It is also prepared to spend a lot of money in this effort.

A case in point is the mind-boggling dollars the federal government has committed to help two companies set up electric vehicle battery manufacturing plants in Ontario

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

While it’s true the government’s climate change focus hasn’t ignored agriculture, the amount of money it’s spending on the sector pales in comparison to that earmarked for two private companies to build electric vehicle batteries in Ontario.

No, this isn’t a petulant demand for fairness, similar to small children who keep track of what presents each receives from Grandma and Grandpa.

But it is glaringly obvious that the federal government is not treating all sectors of the economy equally.

There is little point in demanding that agriculture receive $28.7 billion from the feds because that’s what the battery makers received. But we do expect that agriculture’s important role in climate change mitigation be recognized.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-04-13-at-3.54.04-PM
AI disinformation stress test: Challenges and response strategies
ChatGPT-Image-Feb-16-2026-01_04_32-PM
Raw milk myth wake-up call
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-20-2026-11_17_18-AM-2
10,000 scientists gone: Trump’s cuts create an unprecedented brain drain
Screenshot-2026-04-12-135256
Bixonimania: The fake disease scam that AI swallowed whole
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-23-2026-09_20_20-PM
Kennedy’s CDC blocks publication of study that shows vaccines reduce hospitalizations by 50%, then misrepresents why
images
The never-ending GMO debate: Pros and cons
Screenshot-2026-04-21-at-12.05.38-PM
MAHA’s special protein-focused formula for skin care: Beef tallow and salmon sperm. How could they be wrong?
Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-1.14.34-PM
Latest fevered, right-wing conspiracy: Fox, New York Post, and kooky GOP legislators push ‘Dead Scientists’ scare

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.