A blood test test can detect cancers well before symptoms show up. Don’t expect private insurers or the government to cover costs anytime soon

screenshot pm
Credit: Galleri

Early diagnosis is the best defense against most cancers, as President Biden noted when he announced his Cancer Moonshot initiative two years ago. But only a handful of cancersโ€”of the breast, lung, colon and cervixโ€”have screening tests recommended by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, an independent panel that evaluates medical screenings.

Many companies are developing blood tests that can detect cancer signals before symptoms occur, and Grailโ€™s is the most advanced. A study found it can identify more than 50 types of cancer 52% of the time and the 12 deadliest cancers in Stages I through IIIย 68% of the time.

Thereโ€™s a hitch. The test costs $949 and isnโ€™t covered by Medicare or most private insurance.

Most Americans canโ€™t afford [to pay out of pocket], and some public-health experts think thatโ€™s just as well. They fret that widespread use of multicancer early-detection tests would cause healthcare spending to explode. Those fears have snarled Galleri and similar tests in a web of red tape.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Because Grail uses machine learning to detect DNA-methylation cancer linkages, the Grail testโ€™s accuracy should improve as more tests and patient data are collected. [Grail president Dr. Josh] Ofman says the company also aims to reduce the testโ€™s cost by scaling up manufacturing and detecting cancers with less genetic sequencing.

This is an excerpt. Read the full article here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-04-13-at-1.39.26-PM
Viewpoint: โ€˜Safer for children?โ€™ Stonyfield yogurt under fire for deceptive organic marketing
Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-10.46.29-AM
Viewpoint: How to counter science disinformation? Science journalist offers 12 practical tips
ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-12_16_37-PM-2
Viewpoint: Are cancer rates โ€˜skyrocketingโ€™ as RFK, Jr. and MAHA claim? The evidence says mostly the opposite
Picture1-14
When superbugs threaten vulnerable children: Can AI help solve antibiotic resistance?
ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-08_39_41-PM
GLP podcast: Big Pharma, Big Ag, Big Foodโ€”health harming industries or life-saving innovators?
Screenshot-2026-04-23-at-11.00.36-AM
Regulators' dilemma: Thalidomide, Metformin, and the cost of getting drug approvals wrong
Picture1-1
Cooling the planet with balloons: Could a geoengineering gamble slow global warming?
png-pill-omega-Supp-fish-oil
Millions take omega-3 fish oil for brain health. New research suggests it may do the opposite.
bigstock opioids on chalkboard with rol
GLP podcast: 'Safe injection sites': enabling drug addiction or saving lives?
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.