99+% pesticide free: While activists claim chemicals soak our fruits and vegetables, USDA provides facts

Credit: O Agro
Credit: O Agro
[T]he U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) released its annual Pesticide Data Program report to little fanfare or attention.  We’ve said repeatedly for years that consumers deserve to know more about this annual report that consistently shows how very low residues are, if present at all, and verifies the safety of our fruits and vegetables.  And, yet no consumer media outlets covered the release.

So what are consumers missing?  Here are a few key takeaways from the 231-page report:

  • USDA prioritizes testing foods that are most commonly consumed by infants and children.
  • Because PDP data are used for risk assessments, PDP laboratory methods are geared to detect very low levels of pesticide residues, even when those levels are well below the tolerances (safety levels) established by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
  • Over 99% of the foods sampled by USDA were well below safety limits set by the EPA with 40% having no detectable residues at all.
  • In 2023, 9,832 samples were taken by the USDA program. Fresh and processed fruits and vegetables accounted for 98.2% of the samples. In total, [the] USDA program [personnel] conducted more than 2.8 million pesticide analyses.
  • The publicly available PDP database is among the most comprehensive sources for pesticide residues in foods in the world.
Mis- and disinformation are distorting science and public policy. Subscribe to our Daily and Weekly Digests for incisive coverage of ‘disruptive’ innovations in AI, agricultural biotechnology, food, chemicals, nuclear energy, vaccines, and other disruptive innovations.

The 2.8 million analyses illustrate how thorough the USDA program is.  And yet…. every spring we must suffer through other groups’ manipulation of this data which somehow turns the very positive results from USDA into something negative and includes erroneous claims about produce safety.  And, equally disturbing, media outlets that routinely ignore the USDA PDP report will cover the release of these outside groups’ manipulated data instead.

Each year, the Alliance for Food and Farming (AFF) works to provide the USDA PDP results to consumers and media along with other science-based produce safety information. That work is paying off with fewer and fewer media outlets covering the inaccurate safety claims about fruits and vegetables released by outside groups every spring.

We also share the USDA results with our network of nutritionists who are influencers on mainstream and social media and have a megaphone to consumers everywhere to reassure them about the safety of produce and the importance of eating more.

In today’s environment, misinformation about food safety and nutrition is prevalent making it sometimes challenging to find credible information.  This is why the AFF partners with farmers, registered dietitians, and scientists from academia to provide consumers with fact-based content to help them choose what produce is affordable and accessible to them. And, when the government releases a comprehensive and important report about produce safety, we do our best to raise consumer awareness about it. Especially when others ignore it.

Read the original post here

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Bayer Crop Circle in Golden Wheat
Making fertilizer from thin air: Bayer’s gene-editing innovation could dramatically cut chemical fertilizer use in growing food
Picture1
Viewpoint: How badly is the U.S. food-safety net fraying? FDA’s bungled handling of the tainted lettuce crisis deepens concerns over cuts to disease tracking and response
Reaching Through the Woven Sky
Challenging genetic modification rejectionists: Our evolving food system has relied on science for thousands of years
Screenshot-2026-11-03-at-12.31.18-PM
Gene editing once viewed with suspicion by UK  farmers, upwards of 90% now open to their sustainability benefits
Smiling-Woman-Over-Teal-Abstract-Shapes
Viewpoint: RFK Jr.’s latest foray into junk science: Even Kennedy’s hand-picked NIH director balks at appointment of crackpot mental health director
Neon Genome_ Fetal Dreamscape
The race to genetically engineer babies
Glossy Plastic Bag of Tokens and Labels
Viewpoint: How CNN got played by environmental activists pushing a plastics scare and litigation agenda
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-11-02-at-11.34.28-AM
Farmers are collateral damage in the PFAS “forever chemicals” crossfire. Here’s what they need to know.
Screenshot-2026-10-29-at-11.18.34-AM
Viewpoint: ‘Just the flu’: Skipping your child’s flu shot could be a fatal mistake
Screenshot 2026-10-27 at 10.32
“Do your own research”: What Medicare’s annual open enrollment circus teaches us about the seductive trap of DIY health and science
Screenshot-2026-10-28-at-3.00.44-PM
Viewpoint: Activist attacks on corporations increasingly depend on "attribution" science to target oil companies for global climate change
Red and Green Embroidered Campaign Caps
Viewpoint: The fragile (and often bizarre) MAHA-MAGA-far left health-and-chemicals coalition is fracturing. Here’s why
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.