Synthetic, genetically engineered, and ‘Made in China’: Busting supplement industry myths about the natural wonders of Vitamin C

Screenshot 2025-06-24 at 9.33.45 AM
Dear Vitamin C Aficionados:

This article isn’t about whether you should take the stuff [1]. Instead, it raises some questions about what you think you’re taking vs. what you’re really taking.

If some of you find the following disquieting, I apologize in advance. But (A) it is all true; (B) it’s information your vitamin shops don’t want you to have; and (C) it will possibly screw with your head a little, in an ironic sort of way.

Did you ever wonder where your vitamin C comes from? Perhaps, on some level, you envision a bunch of flaxen-haired beauties with flowers in their hair, blithely frolicking through lush orange groves, lovingly selecting only the finest fruit, which will later be hand-squeezed to ensure that you will be getting nothing short of nature’s miracle itself?

Nope. Vitamin C doesn’t come from flaxen-haired beauties. Keep reading.

You may need to adjust your expectations somewhat. Here is where your vitamin C really comes from.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.
The Novachem Import and Export Company, Wuhan, China bears a striking resemblance to the New Jersey Turnpike near Bayonne, NJ. Or do I have them backwards? Credit: Picryl

But at least it looks idyllic inside:

Credit: Wikimedia Commons

Ninety percent of the vitamin C that is consumed in the U.S. is manufactured in China. And it sure doesn’t come from oranges.

Two  Choices: Both “Bad”

  1. Chemical synthesis

Vitamin C is synthesized in a multi-step sequence invented in 1933 (known as the Reichstein process), which starts with glucose as the raw material. Here are some of the chemicals used:

  • Hydrogen gas and nickel metal under high-pressure
  • Fermentation with oxygen and acetobacter bacteria
  • Acetone (petrochemical), sulfuric acid (will dissolve your spleen, and everything else)
  • Potassium permanganate (good for blowing stuff up)
  • More sulfuric acid (in case it missed some of your spleen the first time)

If the scenario above doesn’t meet your lofty personal standards, there is good news. Sort of. The Reichstein process is mostly obsolete, because of economic and environmental factors. The chemical steps have been replaced by biosynthetic fermentation, carried out by genetically engineered microorganisms.

   2. Fermentation process

While fermentation of glucose may sound more natural (hence better) than the Jersey Turnpike route, it brings along a healthy dose of ironic hilarity.

The one-pot fermentation method above shows the steps carried out by yeast. No problem, right Mr. Natural? Actually, there are several “problems,” or at the very least, a dent in your ideology:

  1. The corn used is genetically modified.
  2. It is then converted into corn starch. Sulfur dioxide, a preservative, is used in during process to inhibit bacterial growth.
  3. The corn starch is converted into glucose (sometimes referred to as “corn syrup”) using an enzyme called α-amylase.
  4. The α-amylase is made from genetically modified yeast and then lab-purified.
  5. The lab-produced glucose is converted into lab-based vitamin C using a fermentation process involving GM yeast strains, such as Ketogulonicigenium vulgare or Bacillus megaterium
Custom designed label?

So, there you go. If you’ve been taking vitamin C supplements, ~90 percent of the time you have been swallowing synthetic stuff that comes from a place as pastoral-looking as the New Jersey Turnpike near Exit 14A.

Or, you can swallow your pride, and embrace GM technology? What to do?

If all of a sudden, you find yourself facing a logical paradox, you are not the first. Gene Roddenberry beat you to it almost 60 years ago:

 

Star Trek Episode #37, November, 1967. 

The “good” news? It doesn’t matter whether your vitamin C comes from flaxen-haired beauties or a place that looks like the Jersey Turnpike — it’s exactly the same. No matter the source, the vitamin C that you don’t need is chemically identical and indistinguishable.

NOTES:

[1] American Council advisor, Dr. David Seres, the director of nutritional medicine at Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, has the following to say: “For most people, there is absolutely no role for a vitamin C supplementation. There is ample proof, from well designed studies, that vitamin C does not prevent even the common cold, let alone anything else.”

Josh Bloom is ACSH’s Director of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Science. Josh earned his Ph.D. in organic chemistry at the University of Virginia, followed by postdoctoral training at the University of Pennsylvania. Find Josh on X @JoshBloomACSH

A version of this article was originally posted at American Council on Science and Health and has been reposted here with permission. Any reposting should credit the original author and provide links to both the GLP and the original article. Find American Council on Science and Health on X @ACSHorg
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-04-14-at-11.11.06-AM
‘Turbo cancer’ or mRNA cancer cure? Strategies to counter misinformation
ChatGPT-Image-May-22-2026-10_26_09-AM
Gutting the National Science Board: How the Trump-RFK, Jr. crusade is erasing the separation of science and state
Picture1
The Orange Bowl without oranges: Can CRISPR save Florida citrus?
Screenshot 2025-11-12 at 3.28
GLP podcast: Evolutionary biologist debunks the 'sex spectrum'
Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesn’t change the science—the world’s most popular herbicide is safe 
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot 2026-05-22 at 3.28
Vagus nerve wellness grift: How to build a billion dollar business. Are you listening, Kelly Ripa?
ChatGPT-Image-May-26-2026-09_19_32-AM
Viewpoint— “A safe space to chat, flirt, and be intimate without sex”: Are new AI companies exploiting vulnerable asexuals?
Screenshot 2026-05-26 at 11.16
Colossal Bio grows chicks in 3D-printed artificial eggs. Breakthrough or copycat technology?
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-16-2026-02_56_53-PM
Financial incentives, over diagnosis, and weak oversight: Autism claims are driving up Medicare costs
ChatGPT-Image-May-1-2026-11_42_59-AM-2
Viewpoint: NAD is the wellness grifters latest evidence-lite longevity fad. At least the mice are impressed.
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.