‘Designer baby’ startup: Controversal germline editing company Bootstrap Bio raising money for germline gene editing launch

Ethical issues aside, CRISPR babies are too risky
Credit: Pixabay | Victoria Watercolor

A California-startup focused on genetically editing human embryos — a step toward creating so-called designer babies — is raising money as many of Silicon Valley’s ultra-rich turn their attention to one of the most controversial technologies in medicine.

Bootstrap Bio…is working on technology to change the DNA in an embryo…Altering those cells to make genetically modified children is intended to eliminate inherited diseases or enhance desirable traits, which can be passed on to future generations.

Mis- and disinformation are distorting science and public policy. Subscribe to our Daily and Weekly Digests for incisive coverage of ‘disruptive’ innovations in AI, agricultural biotechnology, food, chemicals, nuclear energy, vaccines, and other disruptive innovations.

Scientists and ethicists said the technology known as “germline editing” is unproven and potentially dangerous. 

…

“When you’re messing with the safety of babies, you want to be pretty confident,” said Hank Greely, a Stanford University law professor and bioethics expert. “We have no idea what would happen to the babies who are edited.”

…

Bootstrap Bio’s future business plans…included a plan to begin human trials in 2026 or 2027 in Honduras, a place where the company could potentially avoid US regulations.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Bayer Crop Circle in Golden Wheat
Making fertilizer from thin air: Bayer’s gene-editing innovation could dramatically cut chemical fertilizer use in growing food
Glossy Plastic Bag of Tokens and Labels
Viewpoint: How CNN got played by environmental activists pushing a plastics scare and litigation agenda
Picture1
Viewpoint: How badly is the U.S. food-safety net fraying? FDA’s bungled handling of the tainted lettuce crisis deepens concerns over cuts to disease tracking and response
Screenshot-2026-10-30-at-10.55.54-AM
Longevity scandal: The huckster who validates the ‘oldest people in the world’ claims
Screenshot-2026-10-21-at-11.30.51-AM
Viewpoint: Yes, our food system stinks, but the attack of ultra-processed foods is often misplaced
Red and Green Embroidered Campaign Caps
Viewpoint: The fragile (and often bizarre) MAHA-MAGA-far left health-and-chemicals coalition is fracturing. Here’s why
Screenshot-2026-10-28-at-3.00.44-PM
Viewpoint: Activist attacks on corporations increasingly depend on "attribution" science to target oil companies for global climate change
Screenshot-2026-06-18-at-2.52.05-PM
Trump is “terminating” Biden-era rule aimed at cutting climate-warming methane emissions from oil and gas drilling
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Reaching Through the Woven Sky
Challenging genetic modification rejectionists: Our evolving food system has relied on science for thousands of years
Screenshot-2026-10-30-at-11.36.40-AM
An Earth-saving benefit of global warming?: How fossil fuel-burning humans stopped the looming Ice Age
Robots in a Futuristic Conference Meeting
Helpful until we’re helpless? Researchers warn AI is gradually eroding human control
Screenshot 2026-07-29 at 10.40
The COVID vaccine turbo cancer scare is back. Science still proves it’s wrong.
Patriotic Flag in a Glass Flask
Viewpoint: America Last: From the Pentagon to universities, Trump’s corruption of science could inflict lasting, irreversible damage on U.S. research
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.