Viewpoint — AI doomsday projections: Will social media save us or make the panic worse?

The effort to seed content about the dangers of AI across the internet comes as the technology’s growing influence has driven debates about AI into the political mainstream. A wave of viral videos warning about the technology could cause headaches for Silicon Valley-backed super PACs as they seek to minimize restrictions on the industry. …

Most AI experts in academia and industry say there’s no scientific support for claims of imminent danger to the entire species, arguing that the doomsday forecasts overestimate existing technology and under-appreciate the complexity of the real world.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

But AI safety groups moving to sign up content creators believe the blistering pace of AI development should make the public more receptive to their predictions. Some want an immediate halt to any work on superintelligent AI. Others want people to realize that the time to act may be running out.

The flood of accessible content about the potential for AI disaster could inflame political debates engulfing Silicon Valley.

Industry insiders including Chris Lehane, chief global affairs officer at OpenAI, recently blamed incendiary rhetoric from “doomers” for a molotov cocktail being thrown at the home of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot 2025-07-30 at 10.48
Can gene editing eliminate Down syndrome? Scientists have done it in lab-grown cells
ChatGPT Image May 26, 2026, 08_42_17 AM (1)
Viewpoint: Greenpeace and poison: How environmental advocacy groups rely on compliant (and often ignorant) journalists to spread disinformation and spark litigation
Screenshot-2026-05-28-at-1.36.28-PM
Viewpoint: Can mRNA research survive the Trump administration?
ChatGPT Image May 26, 2026, 08_21_36 AM
Limiting gender affirming interventions: Trump administration targets Texas even though it already bans youth access
ChatGPT-Image-May-26-2026-07_51_21-AM-2
Viewpoint: There are more than 1,000 chemicals in a cup of coffee—including many substances that can cause cancer. Why isn’t it banned?
Screenshot-2026-06-03-at-1.24.46-PM
Challenging anti-GMO disinformation: Why genetically-tweaked crops offer bushels of benefits
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-2-2026-03_04_17-PM
Viewpoint: Why the hyper-promoted doping ‘enhanced games’ pseudo Olympics flopped
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-2-2026-11_39_58-AM
Viewpoint: Who is RFK, Jr.’s newly-appointed CDC senior counselor, Sara Brenner — Vaccine skeptic and self-proclaimed “MAHA mom”
tick-DNA
GLP podcast: Spread meat allergy with gene-edited ticks? Bioethicists pose vile ‘thought experiment’
Picture1
Sounds we can’t hear — the hidden planetary signals behind science, fear, and misinformation
Screenshot 2025-11-18 at 3.45
Viewpoint—GMOs and sustainability: Why buying organic foods is the least environmentally-sensitive food choice—without offering any health benefits
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-3-2026-12_33_40-PM-2-1
Viewpoint—The end of ‘ivory tower science’: What does that even mean, and what comes next
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.