Psychological inoculation: With a vaccine to prevent HIV on the horizon, misinformation is soaring. What can be done.

Credit:UNAIDS
Credit:UNAIDS

In a paper we published in BMJ Global Health earlier this year, we mapped the landscape of emerging concerns and false claims beginning to circulate about a future HIV vaccine. 

We found recurring claims, including that HIV prevention tools are designed to harm specific populations; that they cause the conditions they’re meant to prevent; that their side effects are catastrophic and concealed. 

[F]ears about catastrophic, terminal physical harm were what topped the list: that it “will kill you” and claims about liver, kidney and heart failure, bone marrow damage and cancer.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Our team tested an approach called psychological inoculation or pre-bunking, in order to make people less vulnerable to misinformation.

We created 2.5-minute TikTok-style videos that featured the false claims along with an explanation of why the claims were false. …

In a trial with more than 2 000 young South African women (18-29 years old), which is under review for publication, participants who watched the pre-bunking videos increased their intentions to accept a future HIV vaccine after seeing misinformation — while intentions among those who didn’t see the pre-bunking videos and saw only the misinformation were 13% lower ….

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-04-14-at-11.11.06-AM
‘Turbo cancer’ or mRNA cancer cure? Strategies to counter misinformation
Screenshot 2025-07-30 at 10.48
Can gene editing eliminate Down syndrome? Scientists have done it in lab-grown cells
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesn’t change the science—the world’s most popular herbicide is safe 
ChatGPT-Image-May-22-2026-10_56_42-AM-2
‘It’s not super useful’: As wariness about AI grows, Trump proposes rollback of healthcare safeguards
ChatGPT Image May 10, 2026, 08_16_59 PM 2
Overmedicalization? RFK Jr.’s antidepressant crackdown raises conflict questions over his fee stake in Wisner Baum, the tort firm built on suing drug makers
edb7f6d7-2370-418f-9578-74e29678e35c
Facts & Fallacies Podcast: Nicotine vaping—public health miracle, or risk to children? Professor Cliff Douglas
Picture1-5
Science Disinformation Gap: The transatlantic battle over social media and censorship

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.