Video: Are babies born with a moral compass?

Credit: Dreamstime
Credit: Dreamstime

Are people born with a sense of right and wrong? A new study finds young infants can already make moral judgments — revealing new insights into the origins of morality.

Researchers from Japan discovered that eight-month-old babies are capable of punishing antisocial behavior they see in a third party. Therefore, the team believes the drive to punish others for misdeeds is a natural human reaction — rather than something people learn over time.

Study authors note that punishing antisocial behavior is something scientists have only seen humans do, and it is also a universal act across cultures. However, researchers have not fully understood how people develop the framework for their moral behavior.

“Morality is an important but mysterious part of what makes us human,” says lead author Yasuhiro Kanakogi of Osaka University in a media release. “We wanted to know whether third-party punishment of antisocial others is present at a very young age, because this would help to signal whether morality is learned.”

Mis- and disinformation are distorting science and public policy. Subscribe to our Daily and Weekly Digests for incisive coverage of ‘disruptive’ innovations in AI, agricultural biotechnology, food, chemicals, nuclear energy, vaccines, and other disruptive innovations.

“The observation of this behavior in very young children indicates that humans may have acquired behavioral tendencies toward moral behavior during the course of evolution,” the researcher adds. “Specifically, the punishment of antisocial behavior may have evolved as an important element of human cooperation.”

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-11-05-at-1.20.54-PM
$7.35 billion PFAS settlement: 3M to pay people who blame health problems on ‘forever chemicals’ phased out of firefighting foam for more than 20 years
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Crumbling MAHA Stage Portrait
Cataloging the RFK Jr.-MAHA crushing midterm collapse
Wave Crest Over Red Cross
Viewpoint: Here are the election-inspired Trump administration healthcare policy reversals expected in the coming months
Democratic Donkey Plowing at Sunset
Viewpoint: Democratic tsunami: As the red tide recedes, here are the most likely shifts in food and agricultural policy
Blue Checklist in Centered Hand
Viewpoint: From Medicaid cuts to MAHA-backed anti-vaccine and chemical hysteria, voters reject Republicans’ science-skeptical agenda
Aerial Sprayer Over Gradient Fields
Farming, food, and chemicals: Post-midterms, the MAHA alliance between Democrats and MAGA Republicans is bruised but not cowed. What comes next?
Microscopic IVF Egg Injection
With technical barriers to human embryo editing falling, ethical concerns escalate
p22_spraying_2
How climate change is driving increased pesticide usage
Hipster eugenics: better babies for billionaires
Viewpoint: “Positive eugenics”: Reviving a movement reviled and condemned for a century
Reaching Through the Woven Sky
Challenging genetic modification rejectionists: Our evolving food system has relied on science for thousands of years
Bayer Crop Circle in Golden Wheat
Making fertilizer from thin air: Bayer’s gene-editing innovation could dramatically cut chemical fertilizer use in growing food
Picture1
Viewpoint: How badly is the U.S. food-safety net fraying? FDA’s bungled handling of the tainted lettuce crisis deepens concerns over cuts to disease tracking and response
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.