Downside of the amateur beekeeper craze: Honeybees are not endangered and raising them reduces food availability for native bee species

It’s morning on a City of London rooftop. But that rooftop itself is a little oasis: a tennis court-sized patch of meadow complete with clover, buttercups and five beehives.

But only one is buzzing.

The remaining four are empty as the keeper, Dale Gibson of Bermondsey Street Bees, realised such numbers of honeybees were doing more harm than good.

“London is Europe’s most densely populated city for honeybees, possibly the world,” he said.

“We’ve been hijacked by the Save the Bees motto, which has been interpreted as meaning honeybees.”

Related on the SLP

Lead author of controversial bee study: ‘Don’t give up on neonics’ although they may have ‘subtle’, mitigable effects Bumblebees fed high doses of neonicotinoids in laboratory setting did not buzz as much or release pollen

Viewpoint: The shocking consequences after a year of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s distortions, deceptions, and flat-out falsehoods

Retreat from identity labels: Does the sharply declining number of young teens identifying as gay and bisexual reflect an ideological shift?

MAHA moms divided over RFK Jr.’s food‑safety efforts, as recall alerts grow and outbreaks spread

She also thinks their amazing PR detracts awareness from all those other critical pollinating insects – and as they are such efficient gatherers of pollen, they are worse at helping plants to reproduce.

“Honeybees don’t drop much pollen whereas solitary bees, like the red mason bee, are such messy eaters they end up covered in pollen and this falls off on other plants doing the pollination job,” she added.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here