Viewpoint — ‘Completely unethical’: RFK, Jr.’s medical ignorance deprives melanoma cancer-sufferers of a life-saving therapy

Credit: Saint John's Cancer Institute
Credit: Saint John's Cancer Institute

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. doesn’t like our criticism of the Food and Drug Administration’s rejection of Replimune’s life-saving drug for metastatic melanoma. But the Health and Human Services Secretary’s statements at a House hearing [on April 16, 2026] were as bewildering as the FDA rejection.

“[T]he career scientists who looked at that drug said it was not effective,” he said. That isn’t true. The initial panel that reviewed Replimune’s RP1 recommended approval. It was overruled by FDA biologics chief Vinay Prasad. 

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

[T]he FDA last fall agreed to reconsider RP1 and selected a second panel to eliminate what it called “bias.” … So [Prasad] tapped new reviewers who shared his bias against the drug. But even these reviewers didn’t say the drug wasn’t effective. 

The FDA rejection letter instead said it is unclear whether the drug was effective based on contrived reasoning that Mr. Kennedy parroted: “[A]ll the people who were tested also received a chemotherapy drug, so we don’t know what the effect was,” Mr. Kennedy said. Fact-check: No patients in the trial received chemotherapy. 

“I have patients who have been treated with this drug that are still alive today who would otherwise be dead,” [said Anna Pavlick, a physician who has studied melanoma for 25 years.]

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-01_14_50-PM
Viewpoint: Disinformation grift: The wellness industry is a lucrative and mostly worthless marketplace of ‘balms, brews, and baloney’
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-30-2026-01_09_47-PM
Viewpoint: As MAHA blows up over Supreme Court ruling limiting glyphosate litigation, Trump offers toothless plan to reduce pesticides in food
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-23-2026-12_19_35-PM
Ideological red flag: Led by anti-vax doctor, Tennessee is now the U.S. epicenter selling potent ivermectin shown worthless to prevent or treat Covid
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-4-2026-09_39_03-AM
Transgender female athletes and Title IX: Separating ‘policy’ from ‘legality’
Screenshot-2026-06-30-at-10.43.50-AM
Viewpoint: Why are there no approved bioengineered insect-protected (Bt) apples?
Screenshot-2026-06-30-at-3.08.03-PM
From infrared sauna blankets to collagen gummies, here’s the top 10 social-media-promoted wellness shams
photodune farming tractor s
Viewpoint: Glyphosate may be hazardous, but it is not dangerous as used by farmers. Critics of the Supreme Court’s Roundup ruling garble hazard with risk
marijuana-pot-in-hand-nveri-st-xpm-t-abq-fkifeos-s-rws-cmpx-
Facts & Fallacies podcast: Legalized weed drives drug addiction, psychosis?
Screenshot-2026-06-17-at-12.31.01-PM
Viewpoint: The dangerous influence of ‘woke’ post-modernism in science

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.