Are we edging closer to precisely, and safely, editing human embryos?

UK scientists support loosening restrictions limiting embryo research
Credit: Pixabay/ drkontogianniivf

On June 1, an international group of industry and academic collaborators, led by geneticist Dieter Egli at Columbia University, released a preprint on bioRxiv demonstrating the use of base editing in human embryos (2026, DOI: 10.64898/2026.05.30.728989).

Base editing, which allows for precise swapping of one nucleotide for another without creating destructive double-strand breaks in DNA, is an evolution of CRISPR gene editing technology.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Although the base editing didn’t result in aneuploidy, it still had significant off-target effects. The researchers observed editing at sites other than the gene of interest and cases of mosaic embryos, in which not all the cells in the embryo carry the gene edits. For those reasons, the authors argue, more work and ethics discussions are necessary before using genetically edited embryos for clinical in vitro fertilization (IVF).

[David] Barrett has a few blunt words to spare for those who see genetic editing of embryos just beyond the horizon: “Science is not ready for heritable human genome editing.”

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.noReviewsLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-22-2026-09_13_07-AM
Viewpoint—The Strategic Litigation boom: Understanding the tightening coalition among NGOs, foundations, journalists, and tort lawyers
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
How to Include More Strawberries in Your Diet
Strawberries are berries—and 35 other surprising food and drink myths
ChatGPT-Image-May-22-2026-10_26_09-AM
Trump-RFK, Jr. National Science Board firings: Accountability vs. partisan meddling
close up arabica coffee farmer s hands picking beans plant his farm colombia
Viewpoint: Why do so many ‘mainstream’ and ‘respected’ media outlets exaggerate climate change threats?
Screenshot-2026-07-07-at-12.55.44-PM
Viewpoint: Yes, we can adapt to a changing climate without devastating the environment and the economy
diversity
We are entering a new era of personalized medicine—if you’re white

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.