“GMOs make pigs sick” paper avoids rigorous analysis

px pigs
CREDIT: Flickr/titanium22

The following is an edited excerpt.

A long awaited study by Australian Dr. Judy Carman has appeared in the open access journal Journal of Organic Systems. It is an investigation in which pigs were fed so-called real world diets for about 23 weeks, and analyzed for about 35 health-related parameters. Two of the 35 parameters (gut inflammation and ovary size)  were different in pigs whose diets included GM corn and soy beans versus those fed non-GM versions of the same grains.

Are these measured changes due to chance (variation among pigs), overall diet, or is it indeed specifically the transgenic components of the diet that have possible causal effect? The paper avoids rigorous analysis of whether the differences are attributable to chance; There is no clear-cut hypothesis about what component(s) of the diet is different and what effect the component might have specifically on the animal.

Related article:  GM proponents face litigation

It’s more fishing expedition than finding.

Read the full story here: Pigs in the real world — feed them different diets, measure many health parameters, some with show differences– but what does it all mean?

Related Articles:

 

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Genetics Unzipped
Infographic: How dangerous COVID mutant strains develop

Infographic: How dangerous COVID mutant strains develop

Sometime in 2019, probably in China, SARS CoV-2 figured out a way to interact with a specific "spike" on the ...
Untitled

Philip Njemanze: Leading African anti-GMO activist claims Gates Foundation destroying Nigeria

Nigerian anti-GMO activist, physician, and inventor pushes anti-gay and anti-GMO ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
glp menu logo outlined

Newsletter Subscription

Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend