The GLP is committed to full transparency. Download and review our 2019 Annual Report

How useful are animal studies for assessing GM foods?

skv b
This article or excerpt is included in the GLP’s daily curated selection of ideologically diverse news, opinion and analysis of biotechnology innovation.

If in doubt feed it to a rat and see what happens. So goes the philosophy of some regulatory jurisdictions around the world when it comes to the risk assessment of GM food crops.

So, just how valid are such studies scientifically, and if they are not robust and necessary, are they ethical under existing animal ethics regulations?

Unfortunately rats are a very insensitive instrument and, in isolation, are not necessarily a good model for human hazard identification.

The ultimate recommendation of the review was that the routine conduct or requirement of such toxicity studies is not supported scientifically and should be considered unethical given their very limited, if any, contribution to the safety assessment of GM crops.

Related article:  Republished retracted Séralini GMO corn rat study faces harsh criticism from scientists

Read the full, original paper (PDF): Of Rats and Regulators

Additional Resources:


The GLP featured this article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis. The viewpoint is the author’s own. The GLP’s goal is to stimulate constructive discourse on challenging science issues.

Share via
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend