Western Australian organic farmer’s grounds for appeal in GE canola ‘contamination’ case unclear

Kojonup organic farmer Steve Marsh took his neighbour Michael Baxter to court earlier this year, claiming GM canola drifted onto his land and caused him to lose this organic certification in 2010. As well as financial compensation, Marsh wanted Western Australia’s Supreme Court to issue a permanent injunction banning Baxter from planting GM crops. But Justice Kenneth Martin came down on the side of Baxter when he delivered his judgment in May. Steve Marsh has since lodged an appeal.

A full written submission was provided by Marsh and his lawyers last week and it’s now up to Baxter’s team of lawyers to respond within 45 days. The grounds of this appeal haven’t yet been made public and each side is keeping their cards close to their chests.

“The one thing we do know is that the grounds for appeal are not on GM crop safety.  Both sides, the defence and plaintiff, agreed that GM crops were safe so that is an important point for the canola growers of Western Australia and Australia,” says John Snook of the Pastoralists and Graziers’ Association, which has supported Baxter from the beginning

Read the full, original article: The grounds of the appeal to a genetically modified canola court decision is still unclear

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}
screenshot at  pm

Are pesticide residues on food something to worry about?

In 1962, Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring drew attention to pesticides and their possible dangers to humans, birds, mammals and the ...
glp menu logo outlined

Newsletter Subscription

* indicates required
Email Lists
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.