Scientific American: Why trumped up glyphosate controversy obscures benefits of GM technology

glyphosate by the numbers

It’s been awhile since I’ve written on GMOs, but it may be time to start again. Recently, a huge amount of attention was given to an IARC report suggesting that glyphosate (brand name: Roundup), one of the most common pesticides, may cause cancer.

Hypothetically, let’s pretend we could say for certain that glyphosate causes cancer.

a) Would this be sufficient reason to stop using glyphosate?

b) Would this imply that GMO’s are a bad idea?

The answer to both of these questions is no.

If you have an airbag in your car, there’s a risk that it will kill you, but I don’t think anyone would argue that stripping the airbag out of your car is a good idea.

So the question is should not be, “Does glyphosate cause cancer?” but rather, “Is glyphosate worse than the alternative?”

Glyphosate is not GMO

Pretend the most ardent critics are right, and Roundup is the evil spawn of big business and the devil. What does that tell us about GMOs? Well, nothing really.

Related article:  IARC glyphosate bombshell: Scientist who lead review of herbicide withheld data showing no cancer link

As I’ve argued over and over, genetic engineering, like any technology, can be used for good or bad purposes. Some uses are almost sure to be bad in the long term, but that does not mean the technology is a bad thing.

Some critics argue that there are better alternatives to GMO technology, so it’s not worth pursuing. But imagine I came to you in 1945 and suggested that rocketry wasn’t worth pursuing. “Rockets aren’t very accurate,” I’d say, “and they’re only used to launch explosive payloads to hurt people anyway.” If people had stopped pursuing the technology then, we wouldn’t have satellites, interplanetary travel or GPS.

Read full, original article: GMOs are Still the Best Bet for Feeding the World

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
Infographic: The evolutionary history of the COVID-19 coronavirus

Infographic: The evolutionary history of the COVID-19 coronavirus

Reuters analysed over 185,000 genome samples from the Global Initiative on Sharing All influenza Data (GISAID), the largest database of ...
favicon

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
glp menu logo outlined

Newsletter Subscription

Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend