Fact or fiction? 80% of all rare diseases are genetic

rare diseases

The frequently given answer to the question ‘What proportion of rare diseases is genetic?’ is ‘80%’. But where does this statistic come from?

To illustrate the extent of the problem, the Wikipedia page for rare diseases currently mentions the “80% are genetic” statistic twice. Once with a “citation needed” warning, and once with a link to a webpage that is no longer available.

I used Google, Google Scholar, and the Internet Archive to try to find the first time the statistic was given. Some mentions cite the book, The NORD Guide to Rare Disorders, published in December 2002. But I also found it in a company’s press release from April 2002, again mentioned without any source attribution, and presented as an unequivocal fact.

Our investigations lead us to believe that the statement “80% of rare diseases are genetic” should probably be considered folklore rather than fact. If anyone can provide evidence otherwise, or can provide the provenance of the statement please contact us. We would be delighted to find out.

Currently, it seems that it is not known what proportion of rare diseases are genetic. Moreover, it is not easily knowable, because the definition of rare disease is unclear and the cataloguing of rare diseases is not comprehensive.

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion, and analysis. Read full, original post: How many rare diseases are genetic?

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-09-16-at-2.26.42-PM
Viewpoint: How to ecologically damage America’s forests: Ban glyphosate
Screenshot-2026-09-20-at-9.03.54-AM
From Malaysia to the world: A pioneering science communicator reimagines global science communication for a digital age
Screenshot-2026-09-20-at-4.31.28-PM
White House drafting executive order to control what OMB Director Vought claims are “woke” NIH science grants
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-17-2026-12_28_43-PM
Vitamin D, omega-3 fish oil and glucosamine supplements could cause brain damage 
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-20-2026-04_22_32-PM
What’s Trump’s ‘AI Force’? Administration rushes to announce ill-defined watchdog agency and czar amid criticism of its resistance to curb AI acceleration
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-18-2026-10_49_24-AM
‘Symptom borrowing’: Young people are copying health problems they see on TikTok
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-11-2026-01_53_42-PM
Should doctors engage in social media to counter misinformation?
Screenshot-2026-08-12-at-11.31.46-AM
AI is helping develop new vaccines
Screenshot-2026-09-14-at-4.31.14-PM
Viewpoint: What’s the likely impact when the EPA loosens rules limiting methane pollution from oil and gas wells?
Screenshot-2026-08-19-at-6.19.42-PM
Facts & Fallacies podcast: 'Regenerative farming'? RFK Jr.’s federal push romanticizes the past and risks food security
Screenshot-2026-09-10-at-12.20.19-PM
'Jet fuel didn't melt the steel': 9/11 conspiracy theories debunked
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.