Evolution could push back against CRISPR gene editing of insects to stop Zika and malaria

mosquito dengue

Research published [May 2017] suggests that gene editing, a revolutionary cut-and-paste technology that allows bespoke adjustments to an organismโ€™s genome, might not be that effective in changing the long-term characteristics of an insect population.

Michael Wade and Gabriel Zentner, from Indiana University, studied the flour beetle, a serious agricultural pest. They focused on three stretches of the beetleโ€™s genome where so-called where so-called Crispr technology, sometimes compared to genetic tweezers, could potentially snip out or insert genes. Two targets were chosen because of their links to male and female fertility. The third location was selected because it mirrors a spot in a mosquito genome previously scouted as a potential anti-malarial target.

The Indiana researchers, writing in the journal Science Advances, found there was sufficient natural genetic variation in the flour beetles to get rid of any Crispr tampering within just six generations. Not only that, but subsequent generations favoured genes, even rare ones, that circumvented the Crispr intervention. Professor Wade concludes that โ€œthese naturally occurring genetic variants resistant to Crispr are enough to halt attempts at population control using genetic technology, quickly returning wild populations to their pre-Crispr numbersโ€. In insects, at least, evolution has already designed workarounds to human meddling.

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion, and analysis. Read full, original post: Smart insects put a fly in the gene-editing ointment

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

wuhan institute of virology main entrance
โ€‹โ€‹COVID lab leak? Making a case that the Wuhan market origins theory is wrong
Screenshot-2026-06-17-at-9.44.03-AM
Viewpoint: Embryos are becoming the newest battleground of love, loss, and legal uncertainty
Screenshot-2026-06-18-at-11.41.51-AM
Viewpointโ€”Protecting baloney science: Far right senators move to protect the phony homeopathy industry
Screenshot-2026-06-17-at-11.57.12-AM
Viewpoint: Raw milk and the myth of safetyโ€”ProPublica exposes the growing anti-homogenization movement
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-9-2026-01_11_37-PM
Turmeric supplements: More risks than benefits
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpointโ€”โ€œMiracle moleculeโ€ debunked: Why acemannan supplements donโ€™t work
Screenshot-2026-06-18-at-2.52.05-PM
Activist organization accuses Trump of protecting methane-generating stripper wells to benefit billionaire and donor Jeffrey Hildebrandย 
Screenshot-2026-06-16-at-10.02.22-PM
Viewpoint: โ€˜Industrial foodโ€™ primerโ€”Challenging the dangerous delusions of the alternative food movement
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-18-2026-02_32_04-PM
Can illegal social media content be stopped before it goes viral? UK is going to try.
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-16-2026-10_01_45-AM-2
Viewpointโ€”Recursive self-improvement: AI leader Anthropic calls for AI slowdown
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-4-2026-03_07_27-PM
AAP v. Kennedy: While a court challenge grinds on, RFK Jr. quietly advances his anti-vaccine conspiracy agenda

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.