After two years of waiting, the USDA has finally published its proposed regulations to implement labeling of genetically modified crops.
…
There are a few things that I find very interesting, and even encouraging about the proposed rules.
First, the USDA has decided these foods will be called โbioengineeredโ instead of โGMOs.โ Words matter and not only is bioengineered probably a more precise term, it also does not come with the negative connotations associated with โGMOs.โ
…
Second, the use of a symbol to designate that a product contains GMO ingredients is also an important change. Wouldnโt it be great if the USDA created a label that cast bioengineered foods in a positive light? Maybe they could come up with something that represents the environmental benefits for these crops? Friends, that is exactly what they did!
Share this article
…
If I had to choose just one, I would probably pick the smiling sun. At the end of the day, genetically modified crops are green crops and the symbol representing them should express it.
…
Fundamentally, I still believe such a labeling requirement is obnoxious and unnecessary. That being said, if such a law is going to exist, this is definitely the right way to do it.
Read full, original post:ย USDA Publishes Draft GMO Labeling Rules โ And They Are Brilliant!
