How The Non-GMO Project Is Adapting To A Gene-Edited World

Non GMO Labelling

the Non-GMO Project is a non-profit and non-governmental certifying organization created by the owners of two natural foods grocery stores looking to fill a market niche: a non-GMO food labeling standard …. NGP’s butterfly label is now pretty much everywhere. Between 2013 and 2016, sales of products bearing the verified seal increased by 566%.

Over the years, the genetic engineering toolkit has become a lot more crowded. Gene editing techniques like CRISPR have captured much of the public’s attention, and while most gene edited foods aren’t yet on the the possibilities seem endless: non-browning mushrooms and low acrylamide potatoes, reduced gluten wheat and low fat pigs, just to name a few …. will the Non-GMO Project embrace these or will they reject them as GMO?

All of these foods definitely still count as biotechnology, says Megan Westgate, NGP’s Executive Director, and that has no place in a non-GMO food supply. “What makes it biotechnology,” she explains, “is when DNA and RNA are tinkered with in the lab in a very reductionist way.”

Related article:  Chemophobia cast shadow over Earth Day

Westgate says there are important and clear distinctions between GMO engineering and traditional non-GMO breeding methods. The problem, she says, is that “at a very granular level, DNA or RNA is being moved around in isolation [from] the rest of the organism and outside of the constraints of natural processes.” Explains Westgate, “the fundamental concept really is that idea of manipulating nucleic acids in vitro (literally “in glass”) as opposed to in vivo (in a living organism).”

Read full, original article: How The Non-GMO Project Is Adapting To A Gene-Edited World

Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

As Europe sees record coronavirus cases and deaths, Slovakia is testing its entire adult population. WSJ's Drew Hinshaw explains how ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend