EU’s prohibitive gene-editing rules spur unprecedented backlash from plant scientists, crop biotech firms

eu
Credite: The Institute of International and European Affairs

The controversial decision by the European courts [in July 2018] to regulate gene edited organisms as GMOs has already had a damaging effect on European biotechs working in this area. Many believe it could have been prevented through a better dialogue between scientists, legal experts and the general public….

…

Last summer’s decision was initiated by a request from the French government in 2016 to ‘re-interpret’ the current GMO directive based on new plant editing techniques that have arisen since 2001. The resulting decision to apply stricter regulation to organisms that have undergone gene editing has had far reaching outcomes and according to many has conclusively demonstrated that the EU’s GMO directive is ‘no longer fit for purpose.’

…

While the nature of EU law makes it unlikely that the ruling will be overturned any time soon….[i]t has mobilized researchers and businesses working in this space to work together to promote positive change in previously unseen ways.

Indeed, in November [2018] the chief scientific advisors to the European Commission issued a statement concluding that “new scientific knowledge and recent technical developments have made the GMO Directive no longer fit for purpose.”

Read full, original article: Why the GMO Regulations in Europe are ‘Not Fit for Purpose’

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Crumbling MAHA Stage Portrait
Cataloging the RFK Jr.-MAHA crushing midterm collapse
Microscopic IVF Egg Injection
With technical barriers to human embryo editing falling, ethical concerns escalate
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Blue Checklist in Centered Hand
Viewpoint: From Medicaid cuts to MAHA-backed anti-vaccine and chemical hysteria, voters reject Republicans’ science-skeptical agenda
Picture1
Viewpoint: How badly is the U.S. food-safety net fraying? FDA’s bungled handling of the tainted lettuce crisis deepens concerns over cuts to disease tracking and response
Reaching Through the Woven Sky
Challenging genetic modification rejectionists: Our evolving food system has relied on science for thousands of years
Smiling-Woman-Over-Teal-Abstract-Shapes
Viewpoint: RFK Jr.’s latest foray into junk science: Even Kennedy’s hand-picked NIH director balks at appointment of crackpot mental health director
Hipster eugenics: better babies for billionaires
Viewpoint: “Positive eugenics”: Reviving a movement reviled and condemned for a century
Bayer Crop Circle in Golden Wheat
Making fertilizer from thin air: Bayer’s gene-editing innovation could dramatically cut chemical fertilizer use in growing food
Screenshot-2026-10-29-at-11.18.34-AM
Viewpoint: ‘Just the flu’: Skipping your child’s flu shot could be a fatal mistake
Screenshot 2026-11-04 at 12.02
Ever wonder why AI can so easily be duped into manufacturing health misinformation?    
Neon Genome_ Fetal Dreamscape
The race to genetically engineer babies
Screenshot-2026-11-02-at-11.34.28-AM
Farmers are collateral damage in the PFAS “forever chemicals” crossfire. Here’s what they need to know.
Screenshot-2026-11-03-at-12.31.18-PM
Gene editing once viewed with suspicion by UK  farmers, upwards of 90% now open to their sustainability benefits
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.