The National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard โ which requires firms to label โbioengineeredโ foods and beverages โ is unlawful and should be nullified and then revised, according to a lawsuit filed by a coalition of retailers and nonprofits who want stricter GMO labeling laws.
Theย lawโย โโ which will becomeย mandatory in January 2022โโย โย defines bioengineered foods as those that โcontain detectable genetic material that has been modified through certain lab techniques and cannot be created through conventional breeding or found in nature.”
…
The newย lawsuitย โโisย filed in the Northern District of California on July 27 against agriculture secretary Sonny Perdue, ARS administrator Bruce Summers, and the USDA by Natural Grocers, Citizens For GMO Labeling, Label GMOs, Rural Vermont, Good Earth Natural Foods, Puget Consumers Co-Op, and the Center For Food Safety. It takes issue with multiple aspects of the law, from its limited scope, to its requirement to use the word โbioengineeredโ on labels instead of more familiar terms such as โGMOโ or โgenetically engineered.โ
Share this article
The aim is to have the court declare the regulations unlawful and nullify them, and then return the issue to the USDA with orders to fix the unlawful parts, said George Kimbrell, legal director at the Center for Food Safety and counsel in the case, who argues that the rules โfall far short of what consumers reasonably expect and the law requires.โโ
