CRISPR gene editing has shown it can cure sickle cell anemia — raising questions about who can access this life-changing treatment

Credit: Pixnio
Credit: Pixnio

Now, at age 37, free of symptoms, able to be a mom and work a full-time job, [sickle cell patient and CRISPR therapy recipient Victoria] Gray is able to “dream again without limitations,” she said on stage at the [Third International Summit on Human Genome Editing in London]. Her story represents a triumph of CRISPR gene editing, a field of science barely a decade old.  It also shines as a beacon of hope to the millions of people around the world living with sickle cell disease — a disorder long subjected to scientific neglect and medical racism. But the fast-approaching reality of a one-time cure for the disease is also forcing the gene-editing world to grapple with tough questions of equity and access.

The thorny question at the heart of two days of discussion: How to prevent this technology from falling into the same traps as every other one that’s come before.

Summit speakers emphasized that technological innovations in engineering and manufacturing aren’t going to be sufficient. Innovation in pricing, payment, and intellectual property will have to be part of the answer too. “It really feels like we need to have a rethink,” said Claire Booth of University College London, in order “to achieve sustainable and affordable access to life-changing gene therapies.”

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Glossy Plastic Bag of Tokens and Labels
Viewpoint: How CNN got played by environmental activists pushing a plastics scare and litigation agenda
Bayer Crop Circle in Golden Wheat
Making fertilizer from thin air: Bayer’s gene-editing innovation could dramatically cut chemical fertilizer use in growing food
Screenshot-2026-10-30-at-11.36.40-AM
An Earth-saving benefit of global warming?: How fossil fuel-burning humans stopped the looming Ice Age
Screenshot-2026-10-21-at-11.30.51-AM
Viewpoint: Yes, our food system stinks, but the attack of ultra-processed foods is often misplaced
Screenshot-2026-10-30-at-10.55.54-AM
Longevity scandal: The huckster who validates the ‘oldest people in the world’ claims
Screenshot-2026-10-28-at-3.00.44-PM
Viewpoint: Activist attacks on corporations increasingly depend on "attribution" science to target oil companies for global climate change
Picture1
Viewpoint: How badly is the U.S. food-safety net fraying? FDA’s bungled handling of the tainted lettuce crisis deepens concerns over cuts to disease tracking and response
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-06-18-at-2.52.05-PM
Trump is “terminating” Biden-era rule aimed at cutting climate-warming methane emissions from oil and gas drilling
Red and Green Embroidered Campaign Caps
Viewpoint: The fragile (and often bizarre) MAHA-MAGA-far left health-and-chemicals coalition is fracturing. Here’s why
Robots in a Futuristic Conference Meeting
Helpful until we’re helpless? Researchers warn AI is gradually eroding human control
Reaching Through the Woven Sky
Challenging genetic modification rejectionists: Our evolving food system has relied on science for thousands of years
Screenshot 2026-07-29 at 10.40
The COVID vaccine turbo cancer scare is back. Science still proves it’s wrong.
Patriotic Flag in a Glass Flask
Viewpoint: America Last: From the Pentagon to universities, Trump’s corruption of science could inflict lasting, irreversible damage on U.S. research
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.