USDA further liberalizes rules to allow easy approval of more gene-edited crops

Credit: United States Department of Agriculture
Credit: United States Department of Agriculture

Biotech plant developers are pleased with a proposal from USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service to create five new regulatory exemptions for genetically modified plants.

The industry has expressed concern that the U.S. has been falling behind internationally as other countries move toward adopting regulations more favorable to gene-edited crops.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

One of the five proposed exemptions would be for โ€œplants with up to four modifications made simultaneously or sequentially, provided that each modification individually qualifies for exemption and is at a different genetic locus.โ€

USDA regulations finalized in 2020 allow โ€œsome gene-edited products to be exempt, a status that can be confirmed,โ€ Jenkins and others said in a paper in Nature Plants this year. However, the exemption โ€œis only for a very narrow subset (for example, single edit in a diploid or haplotype), causing most gene-edited plants to go through the same Regulatory Status Review process as traditional transgenic crops.โ€

Going from a single edit to four is an improvement, [Dan] Jenkins said, adding, โ€œI really believe that USDA will continue to make adjustments for broadening what could be exempt as they build a record.โ€

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot 2026-05-06 at 2.56
Singularity crisis ahead? Can super babies save us from rogue AI geniuses?
Screenshot-2026-03-13-at-12.14.04-PM
The FDA wants to make many popular prescription drugs OTCโ€”a great idea. Hereโ€™s why itโ€™s unlikely to happen
Screenshot-2026-05-04-at-12.54.32-PM
How Utah became the countryโ€™s supplement capitalย  โ€” and a haven for unregulated, ineffective and fake products
Screenshot-2026-04-20-at-2.26.27-PM
Viewpoint โ€” Food-fear world: The latest activist scientists campaign: Cancer-causing additives
Screenshot-PM-24
Viewpoint: The herbicide glyphosate isnโ€™t perfect. Banning it would be far worse.
images
The never-ending GMO debate: Pros and cons
Screenshot-2026-05-01-at-11.56.24-AM
โ€˜Science moves forward when people are willing to think differentlyโ€™: Memories of DNA maverick Craig Venter
Screenshot-2026-04-03-at-11.15.51-AM
Paraben panic: How a flawed study, media hype, and chemophobia convinced the public of the danger of one of the safest classes of preservatives
Screenshot-2026-04-30-at-2.19.37-PM
5 myths about summer dehydration that could damage your health โ€” or even kill you
79d03212-2508-45d0-b427-8e9743ff6432
Viewpoint: The Casey Means hustleโ€”Wellness woo opportunism dressed up as medical wisdom
ChatGPT-Image-May-1-2026-02_20_13-PM
How RFK, Jr.โ€™s false vaccine claims are holding up $600 million to fight diseases in poor countries
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.