‘It doubles the time of origin of the human species’: How digital technology is rewriting the origin of humanity

Yunxian 2 skull in the Hubei Provincial Museum Credit: Gary Todd/Creative Commons
Yunxian 2 skull in the Hubei Provincial Museum Credit: Gary Todd/Creative Commons

An ancient skull, warped and damaged by the ravages of time and degradation, may have just altered our understanding of the history of modern humans.

Using careful 3D scanning and digital reconstruction techniques, a team of researchers from China and the UK has rebuilt the damaged artifact, discovering exactly where it fits on the hominid family tree.

It’s not the skull of a modern human ancestor, but that of a closely related human. Even so, its age pushes back the timeline for the divergence between the ancestor of Homo sapiens and its close relatives, suggesting that the origin of our species is several hundred thousand years older than we thought it was.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

The morphological traits of the skull, and its age, suggest all these species diverged from each other much sooner than we thought. According to previous estimates, modern humans and Neanderthals diverged around 500,000 to 700,000 years ago.

According to the new calculations, however, the splits occurred all within a very short timeframe of each other, starting around 1.38 million years ago, with Neanderthals peeling off first.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-05-01-at-11.56.24-AM
‘Science moves forward when people are willing to think differently’: Memories of DNA maverick Craig Venter
Screenshot-2026-04-03-at-11.15.51-AM
Paraben panic: How a flawed study, media hype, and chemophobia convinced the public of the danger of one of the safest classes of preservatives
Screenshot-PM-24
Viewpoint: The herbicide glyphosate isn’t perfect. Banning it would be far worse.
79d03212-2508-45d0-b427-8e9743ff6432
Viewpoint: The Casey Means hustle—Wellness woo opportunism dressed up as medical wisdom
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-30-2026-12_21_05-PM-2
The tech billionaires behind the immortality movement
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-27-2026-11_27_05-AM
The myths of “process”: What science says about the “dangers’ of synthetic products and ultra-processed foods
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Drinking lots of water can help reduce the effects of aging
Nanoplastics in drinking water: MAHA activists forge science-based bipartisan coalition 
ChatGPT-Image-May-1-2026-03_16_32-PM
Viewpoint: How ‘health care guru’ Joe Rogan circumvented the FDA’s skepticism on psychedelics
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-3-2026-01_17_14-PM
MAHA wellness influencers deride proven anxiety medications, tout lifestyle fixes
ChatGPT Image Apr 30, 2026, 01_11_41 PM
Trump’s America First health aid cuts: Retrenchment has already hit global malaria, HIV, TB, and polio programs
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-30-2026-05_00_48-PM
Wellness grifter physician turned wellness influencer out as surgeon general nominee
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.