Okay, but not nearly enough: EU’s loosened restrictions on CRISPR and other gene-edited crops help, but it’s still a wasteful long-haul for approvals

Credit: Future Learn
Credit: Future Learn

The first part of the EU’s Biotech Act has been published. The act, which is mainly focused on health, also touches on food innovation and the regulation around novel foods.

Overall, it’s a mixed bag. On the one hand, the act increases novel food pre-submission interactions between the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the applicant. On the other, novel foods are explicitly cut out of planned regulatory sandboxes for new biotech products.

The EU’s novel food approval process is known for two things: first, the stringency and high quality of its assessments, and secondly, the fact they can take a long, long time.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

While this first aspect is enough to make EFSA’s approval a desirable accreditation for any start-up, it also means approval is a costly and time-consuming process. Because EFSA takes so long to approve novel foods, investors have been reluctant to embrace areas that rely heavily on these approvals, such as cultivated meat.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Sep-2-2026-10_30_14-PM
Zero: That is the official American measles death toll for 2026. Here is what RFK Jr.’s CDC leaves out.
Screenshot-2026-09-10-at-12.20.19-PM
'Jet fuel didn't melt the steel': 9/11 conspiracy theories debunked
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-14-2026-11_36_25-AM
How the reckless AI race among Anthropic, OpenAI and China spawned today’s safety crisis
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-13-2026-10_24_17-AM
Bayer urges court to approve $7.25 billion Monsanto Roundup settlement that could limit its future liabilities
ChatGPT-Image-Aug-28-2026-03_33_46-PM
Viewpoint: Bad science—Five bogus Trump administration claims about vaccines and autism
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
screenshot at  am
‘Glyphosate is not carcinogenic’: Independent EU chemical oversight agency reaffirms—for the 3rd time in 9 years—that the herbicide is safe-as-used
Screenshot-2026-09-14-at-10.52.30-AM
AI is being used in dangerous bioscience experiments
Screenshot-2026-09-14-at-3.07.56-PM
Trump EPA rolls back power-plant climate rules—and moves to block future carbon limits
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-14-2026-02_57_24-PM
Viewpoint: 6 Atlantic Council expert opinions on the U.S., China and the AI safety crisis
Screenshot-2026-08-04-at-11.36.16-AM
Viewpoint: Emotion-driven stories of doctors allegedly ignoring patient concerns are driving vaccine hesitancy
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-13-2026-10_46_11-AM
“Hit the brakes”: Anthropic warns the race to superintelligence could spawn internet-seizing AI swarms—and empower authoritarians. Here’s how to stop it.
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-14-2026-01_57_57-PM
Anthropic claims to thwart AI-based cyberattacks, surveillance, and biological weapons research
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.