Newly approved GMO chestnut trees planted across from the White House are stirring debate

Credit: NPS
Credit: NPS

Two genetically engineered American chestnut trees planted near the White House this spring have reignited a decades-old fight over how to bring back a species blight wiped out a century ago, as The Washington Post’s Jake Spring reports. The trees, a blight-resistant variety called Darling 54 carrying a single wheat gene, prompted the USDA to deregulate the variety last week — the first time a “forest tree,” rather than a farmed crop, has cleared that bar.

Mis- and disinformation are distorting science and public policy. Subscribe to our Daily and Weekly Digests for incisive coverage of ‘disruptive’ innovations in AI, agricultural biotechnology, food, chemicals, nuclear energy, vaccines, and other disruptive innovations.

Not everyone’s celebrating. Internal documents reviewed by the Post suggest staff failed to contain the trees’ pollen as required under their USDA permit, raising the chance the transgenic wheat gene drifted to wild chestnuts nearby. “We are in uncharted territory,” says Michael Hansen, a senior staff scientist at Consumer Reports, warning that ecosystem effects “you don’t know until you do those studies.” American Chestnut Foundation president Michael Goergen worries about “contamination of the gene pool” — a rift that split his group from the tree’s academic developers in 2023. Still, SUNY ESF’s Andrew Newhouse calls the deregulation “huge,” the first time biotech has cleared this bar for conservation rather than agriculture.

Read the original article here

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-10-02-at-9.11.36-AM
The genetics of personality
strand of dna genetics
No, GMO foods do not “damage genes, natural disposition and hormones, or decrease physical health and intelligence”
Radioactive-Americana-Collage-2
The kooky logic behind the raft of spurious cancer claims from Harvard’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health
Screenshot-2026-09-28-at-11.26.17-AM
Viewpoint: Wellness movement activists reposition nicotine from a killer addictive drug into a cure-all for brain ills
Supreme-Court-Amid-Climate-Crisis
Should fossil fuel companies be shielded from lawsuits over climate change damage? The Supreme Court takes up the question
Screenshot-2026-10-02-at-8.56.38-AM
Trump finalizes Medicare drug price cuts, drawing Big Pharma’s fury and a legal challenge
Screenshot-2026-10-02-at-11.12.24-AM
‘Why do we keep falling for this stuff?’ America’s love affair with snake oil salesmen and scams
Screenshot 2025-09-17 at 12.41
Jump-starting global warming: Rising temperatures are driving up emissions from wildfires, fermenting wetlands, and melting permafrost
Screenshot-2026-10-06-at-2.36.47-PM
Is organic farming really more sustainable? 100 recent studies say ‘no’
AI-Force-Leadership-Portrait
Jay Clayton controversy: The divisive history of Trump’s newly-appointed AI czar
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.