Opinion: Greenpeace’s ‘fearmongering’ gives environmental advocacy a bad name

Screen Shot at PM

The little town of Saint-Félicien, in Quebec’s lovely Saguenay region, is under siege.

“Greenpeace wants our total death!” mayor Gilles Potvin complained back in 2013. “If we listen to them, we can’t cut wood anymore.”

Greenpeace has been waging a relentless campaign against Resolute Forest Products, the largest forest company in the region and in Canada.

The region’s mayors, union leaders, mill workers, and Indigenous leaders are fed up with Greenpeace. They’re angry at being portrayed by outsiders as forest destroyers.

“Greenpeace, in our view, is a group that goes to the extreme, that doesn’t seek a balance between conservation and forest management,” Jack Picard, a band council member of the Innu Nation of Pessamit in Quebec, says in a video. He adds: “We don’t accept anyone else speaking for us. We are fully capable of speaking for ourselves.”

Greenpeace’s fearmongering gives environmental activism a bad name. Last year more than 100 Nobel laureates signed a letter urging them to drop their campaign against genetically modified foods and golden rice, which increase crop yields and provide crucial nutrients that prevent disease and death. Greenpeace is a menace to the world, and especially to the world’s most vulnerable. It is also enormously powerful.

“I used to respect Greenpeace, but they are not aware of the reality of the forest industry,” [Potvin said]. “Young people believe them. Students believe them. They spread a lot of falsehoods, and they do a lot of damage.”

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion, and analysis. Read full, original post: Greenpeace is a menace to the world

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Sep-2-2026-10_30_14-PM
Zero: That is the official American measles death toll for 2026. Here is what RFK Jr.’s CDC leaves out.
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-13-2026-10_24_17-AM
Bayer urges court to approve $7.25 billion Monsanto Roundup settlement that could limit its future liabilities
Screenshot-2026-09-10-at-12.20.19-PM
'Jet fuel didn't melt the steel': 9/11 conspiracy theories debunked
screenshot at  am
‘Glyphosate is not carcinogenic’: Independent EU chemical oversight agency reaffirms—for the 3rd time in 9 years—that the herbicide is safe-as-used
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-14-2026-11_36_25-AM
How the reckless AI race among Anthropic, OpenAI and China spawned today’s safety crisis
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Aug-28-2026-03_33_46-PM
Viewpoint: Bad science—Five bogus Trump administration claims about vaccines and autism
Screenshot-2026-09-14-at-3.07.56-PM
Trump EPA rolls back power-plant climate rules—and moves to block future carbon limits
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-13-2026-10_46_11-AM
“Hit the brakes”: Anthropic warns the race to superintelligence could spawn internet-seizing AI swarms—and empower authoritarians. Here’s how to stop it.
Screenshot-2026-09-14-at-10.52.30-AM
AI is being used in dangerous bioscience experiments
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-14-2026-02_57_24-PM
Viewpoint: 6 Atlantic Council expert opinions on the U.S., China and the AI safety crisis
Screenshot-2026-08-04-at-11.36.16-AM
Viewpoint: Emotion-driven stories of doctors allegedly ignoring patient concerns are driving vaccine hesitancy
ChatGPT-Image-Aug-14-2026-11_16_47-AM
Fibermaxxing: Latest Instagram diet craze raises hope that a fiber-rich diet can improve health
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.