Do cell phones cause cancer? Long-awaited study offers mixed results, no definitive answer

texting mn e bbe e d bd a eb a focal x

The long-awaited results ofย a $25 million National Institutes of Healthย study on the effects of cellphone radio-frequency radiation exposureย on animals is out, and the results are mixed. They showed a higher risk of tumors, DNA or tissue damage, and lower body weight in some groups of rodents, butย no obviousย ill effect inย others and no clear implications for human health.

โ€ฆ

The new NIH study showed tumors in rats and mice inย other parts of the body โ€” the brain, prostate, liver and pancreas โ€” but the scientists said it was unclear whether those were related to the radiation.

Theย experiment involvedย placing rats and mice into special chambersย and exposing them to levels of radiation that mimic 2G and 3G phones, which were standard when the study was launched, for nine hours a day.

Researchers said that they found some tissue and DNA issues but that โ€œwe donโ€™t feel sufficient understanding to comment on their biological significance.โ€

โ€ฆ

The Food and Drug Administration, which commissioned the study, released a statement describing โ€œtheย mostly equivocal, or ambiguous, evidence that whole body radio-frequency energy exposures given to rats or mice in the study actually caused cancer in these animals.โ€

Read full, original post:ย Cellphone radiation study finds mixed effects in rodents, without clear implications for human health

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT Image Jun 3, 2026, 03_14_43 PM
Viewpoint: How Earthjustice became the poster child for the abuse of special interest activist funding
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-11-2026-01_15_03-PM
Selective Pressure, Selective Silence
ChatGPT Image Jun 3, 2026, 03_54_37 PM
Viewpoint: โ€œTurn on, tune in, drop outโ€โ€”Kennedy embraces the Timothy Leary psychedelic revolution
Screenshot-2026-06-05-at-2.12.30-PM
Some plants can poison you. So how did humans figure out what is safe to eat?
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpointโ€”โ€œMiracle moleculeโ€ debunked: Why acemannan supplements donโ€™t work
Screenshot 2026-05-26 at 10.15
Viewpoint: Double standardโ€”Why does the wellness industry get a free pass while Big Healthcare is treated as morally suspect?
ChatGPT-Image-May-26-2026-07_51_21-AM-2
Viewpoint: There are more than 1,000 chemicals in a cup of coffeeโ€”including many substances that can cause cancer. Why isnโ€™t it banned?
ChatGPT Image May 28, 2026, 08_16_38 PM
Viewpoint: Why the EPA mismeasures cancer risk of chemicals and what should be done to fix it
Picture1
Sounds we canโ€™t hear โ€” the hidden planetary signals behind science, fear, and misinformation
Screenshot-2026-06-03-at-1.24.46-PM
Challenging anti-GMO disinformation: Why genetically-tweaked crops offer bushels of benefits

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.