Sustainable meat? Debate over the benefits (or drawbacks) of cell-based beef and chicken more nuanced than critics and supporters acknowledge

Plant based or cell based? Maybe both? Credit: Kate Dehler
Plant based or cell based? Maybe both? Credit: Kate Dehler

In 2016 I was pretty optimistic about lab grown meat, and now I am still optimistic but more tempered. I think I fell for a common futurist mistake of overestimating short term progress, but in my defense the industry was also overly optimistic.

Mis- and disinformation are distorting science and public policy. Subscribe to our Daily and Weekly Digests for incisive coverage of ‘disruptive’ innovations in AI, agricultural biotechnology, food, chemicals, nuclear energy, vaccines, and other disruptive innovations.

Bioreactors are expensive to build and operate. The optimistic projections of cultured meat are dependent upon a dramatic reduction in cost through improvements in technology. They are also dependent upon the ability to scale up production.

Both of these are problematic assumptions, and so far have proven overly optimistic.

For example, even a very large and expensive bioreactor facility could produce in a year what a similarly priced meat processing plant can produce in a week. About 5,000 such facilities would be necessary to produce the current output of the meat industry. That’s not impossible, just very expensive.

Still, there are companies claiming significant reduction in the cost per pound of cultured meat. An Israeli company, Future Meat, claims it can produce cultured chicken at $7.70 per pound, about twice as expensive as meat from chickens. Given that the price started at about $30,000 per pound, it does not seem unreasonable to think that another 50% reduction is possible.  A cultured meat burger would now set you back about $9.80. That’s an expensive burger, but within the range you might pay at a restaurant rather than fast food.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-09-20-at-9.03.54-AM
From Malaysia to the world: A pioneering science communicator reimagines global science communication for a digital age
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-17-2026-12_28_43-PM
Vitamin D, omega-3 fish oil and glucosamine supplements could cause brain damage 
Screenshot-2026-09-16-at-2.26.42-PM
Viewpoint: How to ecologically damage America’s forests: Ban glyphosate
Screenshot-2026-09-20-at-4.31.28-PM
White House drafting executive order to control what OMB Director Vought claims are “woke” NIH science grants
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-20-2026-04_22_32-PM
What’s Trump’s ‘AI Force’? Administration rushes to announce ill-defined watchdog agency and czar amid criticism of its resistance to curb AI acceleration
Screenshot-2026-08-12-at-11.31.46-AM
AI is helping develop new vaccines
Screenshot-2026-09-14-at-4.31.14-PM
Viewpoint: What’s the likely impact when the EPA loosens rules limiting methane pollution from oil and gas wells?
Screenshot-2026-08-19-at-6.19.42-PM
Facts & Fallacies podcast: 'Regenerative farming'? RFK Jr.’s federal push romanticizes the past and risks food security
ChatGPT-Image-Aug-28-2026-03_33_46-PM
Viewpoint: Bad science—Five bogus Trump administration claims about vaccines and autism
Screenshot-2026-09-10-at-12.20.19-PM
'Jet fuel didn't melt the steel': 9/11 conspiracy theories debunked
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-9-2026-02_48_24-PM
Viewpoint: Trump-RFK Jr. report on “Gender Ideology & Left-wing Ideology’ targets LGBTQ community—and science
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.