‘Realistic and durable’: EPA proposes loosening restrictions on some PFAS ‘forever chemicals.’

Screenshot 2026-05-22 at 11.31.40 AM

The Trump administration … moved to partially roll back drinking water protections from toxic “forever chemicals.”

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed to allow some delays for water systems to regulate these chemicals.

It also said it would rescind four of the six types of forever chemicals covered under a Biden-era rule.

Under that Biden-era regulation, water systems are required to filter out at least some of these toxic substances by a 2029 deadline.

Now, the administration is proposing to allow companies to apply for extensions to push that deadline back to 2031 ….

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

An EPA official told reporters that extensions would be granted on a case-by-case basis and that even with an extension, systems with high levels of contamination would need to take interim measures to reduce it. The official declined to say whether most companies that apply for an extension would be likely to receive one.

EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin on [May 18, 2026] described the approach as realistic and legally durable.

“Technologies are still being developed,” he said. “A deadline you cannot physically meet is not a public health protection.”

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.noReviewsLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
organic scaled
Facts & Fallacies podcast: Organic food cuts pesticide exposure? A response to Dr. Rhonda Patrick
kratom
Viewpoint: Kratom ‘supplement’ crisis: DEA sits on its hands while patient addictions to this ineffective drug  rise
close up arabica coffee farmer s hands picking beans plant his farm colombia
Viewpoint: Why do so many ‘mainstream’ and ‘respected’ media outlets exaggerate climate change threats?
Screenshot 2026-07-22 at 10.25
Science brain drain escalates as Trump purge extends to USDA
How to Include More Strawberries in Your Diet
Strawberries are berries—and 35 other surprising food and drink myths
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-22-2026-09_13_07-AM
Viewpoint—The Strategic Litigation boom: Understanding the tightening coalition among NGOs, foundations, journalists, and tort lawyers
diversity
We are entering a new era of personalized medicine—if you’re white
Screenshot-2026-07-01-at-2.49.48-PM
Dr. TikTok and male fertility: Viral claims tout GLP-1 drugs as fertility boosters. What does the science say?
ChatGPT-Image-May-22-2026-10_26_09-AM
Trump-RFK, Jr. National Science Board firings: Accountability vs. partisan meddling
Screenshot-2026-07-07-at-12.55.44-PM
Viewpoint: Yes, we can adapt to a changing climate without devastating the environment and the economy
using genetics to reverse aging
Is the longevity obsession a new form of ageism?
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-02_53_56-PM
Embryo gene editing is on the horizon, stirring mixed emotions
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.