Abortion rights opponents outraged after FDA says its “safety review” of the already-found-safe mifepristone abortion pill will continue into 2027

Credit: Flickr
Credit: Flickr

The FDA’s reevaluation of mifepristone, the nation’s most widely used abortion pill, won’t wrap up until next year — and the anti-abortion movement is not pleased. As CBS News reports, with contributions from the Associated Press, the agency laid out its timeline in a court-ordered filing late on October 7, 2026.

The update offers the first real look at the review Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. ordered. The FDA expects to finish its safety study by mid-December, with a report on the findings due “no later than March 2027.” Only then will it decide whether new restrictions are warranted.

To get there, the agency says it is applying a “statistical data mining method” to an electronic database of medical injury and side-effect reports, hunting for “unknown safety concerns.” That’s a notable search for a drug the FDA approved in 2000 and has repeatedly reaffirmed as safe.

The slower pace drew sharp words from Gavin Oxley of Americans United for Life, who faulted the Trump administration for a lack of “true leadership” and called it “clearly uninterested in mitigating the ongoing harms caused by the abortion pill.” Anti-abortion groups and their congressional allies have pressed for new limits on mifepristone since Trump returned to office.

Mis- and disinformation are distorting science and public policy. Subscribe to our Daily and Weekly Digests for incisive coverage of ‘disruptive’ innovations in AI, agricultural biotechnology, food, chemicals, nuclear energy, vaccines, and other disruptive innovations.

The filing stems from a Louisiana lawsuit arguing that mail delivery of the pill undermines the state’s abortion ban. A 5th Circuit panel questioned that case’s merits last month, and the Supreme Court has blocked any changes to the drug until it hears the case.

Meanwhile, the FDA is weighing petitions to change how mifepristone is prescribed and distributed. CBS News medical correspondent Dr. Celine Gounder has noted that a review could curb telehealth and mail access, or limit prescribing to doctors rather than nurses and physician assistants.

Read the original article here

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-10-12-at-10.44.38-AM
Widely condemned as unethical, hepatitis B vaccine study funded by RFK Jr’s CDC gets a final greenlight
Screenshot-2026-10-11-at-10.24.21-AM
Viewpoint: RFK Jr.’s new CDC head Erica Schwartz greenlights hepatitis B vaccine study critics call “unethical and designed to cast doubts on its safety”
Personalized-Cancer-mRNA-Vaccine-Vial
Personalized mRNA vaccines are poised to revolutionize cancer treatments. Here are the barriers.
Open-Menthol-Cigarette-Pack
How the tobacco industry conspired with conservative activists to kill the Biden administration’s proposed ban on menthol cigarettes 
Screenshot-2026-10-05-at-11.57.44-AM
Scaremongering or legitimate safety concerns? The political dogfight over America’s food safety system
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Cross and Syringe Standoff
Viewpoint: Hijacking Jesus: How anti-vaccine fanatics are exploiting religious exemptions and killing children
Screenshot 2026-10-12 at 12.25
Tearful onions? CRISPR has a solution for that
Profile and Vaccination Portraits
Convinced COVID shots cause widespread harm, Kennedy plans federal initiative to incentivize doctors to report alleged injuries
Screenshot-2026-10-12-at-12.18.57-PM
5 deaths, 1,000 reported cases: These horrific numbers underestimate the consequences of the anti-vax movement
Eating Nuts Adds up to Longer Life x
For millions with peanut allergies, Nurtured Nuts’ CRISPR gene-edited peanuts could ease the fear of accidental exposure
Screenshot-2026-09-22-at-12.26.15-PM
‘Forever chemical’ concerns: Separating hysteria from reasonable concern in the debate over PFAS danger
Caution-Taped-Fresh-Produce-Aisle
Should we be afraid of our food?
Deepfake Democracy Media Mosaic
31 states have passed a patchwork of laws to limit election deepfake commercials. They’re not working very well.
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.