Viewpoint: RFK Jr.’s latest foray into junk science: Even Kennedy’s hand-picked NIH director balks at appointment of crackpot mental health director

RFK Jr. has passed over a highly regarded neuroscientist to lead the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), favoring instead a “metabolic psychiatrist” who has never held an NIH grant and was turned down by the agency’s own search committee. As Science-Based Medicine’s Steven Novella argues, the choice says more about ideology than qualifications.

NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya, a Kennedy appointee, recommended Vikaas Sohal for the post, “a very accomplished and appropriate scientist,” according to Novella, a clinical neurologist at the Yale University School of Medicine and executive editor of Science-Based Medicine. But, as Science reported, Bhattacharya “was overruled by his boss,” Novella writes. Kennedy’s pick is Shebani Sethi, whose research centers on ketogenic diets as a treatment for psychiatric illness.

“The full story is disturbing, and represents RFK’s continued ‘Lysenkoisation’ of the American health infrastructure,” Novella writes, invoking the Soviet campaign that subordinated biology to political dogma.

Metabolic psychiatry holds that metabolic health is a major contributor to, and possibly the root cause of, serious mental illness. Novella doesn’t dismiss the link outright. Exercise, nutrition, sleep and blood pressure all affect brain health. But those are secondary contributors, he argues, not root causes or cures. The trouble is that “proponents tend to go way beyond the current research, and are making claims for an entirely new explanatory paradigm of mental illness.”

The evidence doesn’t support that leap. Novella notes that most metabolic psychiatry studies are preliminary, poorly controlled or merely correlational, and so can’t establish what causes what. A 2026 systematic review of ketogenic diets for anxiety and depression, published in JAMA Psychiatry, found modest improvements in depressive symptoms, particularly when ketosis was verified, while evidence for anxiety was inconclusive. The authors called for larger, well-powered trials.

Mis- and disinformation are distorting science and public policy. Subscribe to our Daily and Weekly Digests for incisive coverage of ‘disruptive’ innovations in AI, agricultural biotechnology, food, chemicals, nuclear energy, vaccines, and other disruptive innovations.

Novella likens the pattern to the hype around EMDR therapy and the old serotonin explanation for antidepressants: early, promising findings stretched into sweeping claims about how well a treatment works and why.

Sethi’s own work fits that mold, he argues. Her ketogenic diet studies are mostly uncontrolled or poorly controlled, yet her public statements are far more enthusiastic. “We’re seeing huge changes,” she has said, extending the claim to patients taking antipsychotic medications. That kind of overreach, Novella contends, is the opposite of the causal skepticism an NIMH director needs.

“She seems underqualified, and the search committee seems to have come to the same conclusion,” Novella writes. Her research does, however, align neatly with Kennedy’s Make America Healthy Again agenda, which, in his assessment, “is apparently all that matters.”

Read the original article here

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-11-05-at-1.20.54-PM
$7.35 billion PFAS settlement: 3M to pay people who blame health problems on ‘forever chemicals’ phased out of firefighting foam for more than 20 years
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Crumbling MAHA Stage Portrait
Cataloging the RFK Jr.-MAHA crushing midterm collapse
Blue Checklist in Centered Hand
Viewpoint: From Medicaid cuts to MAHA-backed anti-vaccine and chemical hysteria, voters reject Republicans’ science-skeptical agenda
Democratic Donkey Plowing at Sunset
Viewpoint: Democratic tsunami: As the red tide recedes, here are the most likely shifts in food and agricultural policy
Wave Crest Over Red Cross
Viewpoint: Here are the election-inspired Trump administration healthcare policy reversals expected in the coming months
Aerial Sprayer Over Gradient Fields
Farming, food, and chemicals: Post-midterms, the MAHA alliance between Democrats and MAGA Republicans is bruised but not cowed. What comes next?
Microscopic IVF Egg Injection
With technical barriers to human embryo editing falling, ethical concerns escalate
p22_spraying_2
How climate change is driving increased pesticide usage
Hipster eugenics: better babies for billionaires
Viewpoint: “Positive eugenics”: Reviving a movement reviled and condemned for a century
Reaching Through the Woven Sky
Challenging genetic modification rejectionists: Our evolving food system has relied on science for thousands of years
Bayer Crop Circle in Golden Wheat
Making fertilizer from thin air: Bayer’s gene-editing innovation could dramatically cut chemical fertilizer use in growing food
Picture1
Viewpoint: How badly is the U.S. food-safety net fraying? FDA’s bungled handling of the tainted lettuce crisis deepens concerns over cuts to disease tracking and response
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.