Mutation rates may explain why plants can live much longer than animals

Scientists can’t offer a simple, straightforward answer to why plants can get so much older than animals. But they have gathered a lot of intriguing evidence that may lead them to one. For one thing, the biology of aging is different in some important respects in animals and plants, as Howard Thomas of Aberswyth Aberystwyth University in Scotland  Wales explained last year in the journal New Phytologist.

As we animals get older, things go wrong. For example, as our cells divide, their DNA sometimes mutates. This can cause the cells to malfunction or even turn cancerous. This burden of mutations only gets greater the older we get. We can try to fix this damage–repairing DNA, killing off defective cells, and so on–but that takes a lot of energy, energy that animals could otherwise use for other purposes, like reproducing.

Plants don’t seem to have to deal with these challenges. Trees that are 4700 years old don’t have more mutations in their cells than much younger plants. It’s possible that they lack those mutations because a kind of evolutionary struggle taking in the tissues of old plants. If some cells suffer mutations, other cells that are in better shape will take over and continue to grow healthy tissue.

Read the full, original story: Young Animals and Old, Old Plants

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Crumbling MAHA Stage Portrait
Cataloging the RFK Jr.-MAHA crushing midterm collapse
Microscopic IVF Egg Injection
With technical barriers to human embryo editing falling, ethical concerns escalate
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Blue Checklist in Centered Hand
Viewpoint: From Medicaid cuts to MAHA-backed anti-vaccine and chemical hysteria, voters reject Republicans’ science-skeptical agenda
Hipster eugenics: better babies for billionaires
Viewpoint: “Positive eugenics”: Reviving a movement reviled and condemned for a century
Reaching Through the Woven Sky
Challenging genetic modification rejectionists: Our evolving food system has relied on science for thousands of years
Smiling-Woman-Over-Teal-Abstract-Shapes
Viewpoint: RFK Jr.’s latest foray into junk science: Even Kennedy’s hand-picked NIH director balks at appointment of crackpot mental health director
Picture1
Viewpoint: How badly is the U.S. food-safety net fraying? FDA’s bungled handling of the tainted lettuce crisis deepens concerns over cuts to disease tracking and response
Bayer Crop Circle in Golden Wheat
Making fertilizer from thin air: Bayer’s gene-editing innovation could dramatically cut chemical fertilizer use in growing food
Screenshot-2026-10-29-at-11.18.34-AM
Viewpoint: ‘Just the flu’: Skipping your child’s flu shot could be a fatal mistake
Screenshot 2026-11-04 at 12.02
Ever wonder why AI can so easily be duped into manufacturing health misinformation?    
Neon Genome_ Fetal Dreamscape
The race to genetically engineer babies
Screenshot-2026-11-02-at-11.34.28-AM
Farmers are collateral damage in the PFAS “forever chemicals” crossfire. Here’s what they need to know.
Screenshot-2026-11-03-at-12.31.18-PM
Gene editing once viewed with suspicion by UK  farmers, upwards of 90% now open to their sustainability benefits
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.