Gene therapy dilemma: Would you tweak your child’s genes if it might prolong life but leave her deaf?

Every time we decide to take a drug, we complete aย personalย risk benefit analysis. For example, will the pain relief promised by this ibuprofen or acetaminophen outweigh the chances of developingย  a stomachache?

And what if that calculus is a little more intense? Parents of children with a rare genetic disease may be choosing between prolonging their kidโ€™s life at the expensive of leaving him deaf according to the Wall Street Journal:

Families in the drug trial must decide whether to permit the higher doses of cyclodextrin that research shows might arrest the disease. Hearing loss is one side effect. โ€œDeaf or death, what are our options?โ€ said Andrea Marella.โ€œWe have to keep moving forward.โ€

Andreaโ€™s son Andrew has Niemann-Pick disease type C (NPC), a very rare genetic disease that leads to faulty breakdown and movement of fats inside the cells of the body. As the fats build up, people with NPC experience unsteady movements, then dementia and ultimately death.

The drug, cyclodextrin, offers hope to relieve symptoms and prolong quality of life for NPC patients. But it is also likely to cause hearing loss by damaging the tiny hairs called cilia in the outer ear that help amplify sound. The chance of hearing loss is so likely that every child who gets the drug will probably experience at least some. But for the Marellas, the chance to have a few more years of healthy life with Andrew outweighs the risk of deafness.

These complex risk analyses are just one part of an expanding healthcare calculus. One that requires patients and healthcare systems to balance potential harm, potential benefit and cost. Andrew is part of a clinical trial so the medication and associated costs are covered. But in the majority of upcoming treatments genetic disorders, patients and providers will also have to think about costs.

Take for example the drug Glybera, arguably the first gene therapy to hit the market. It will cost $1 million, but cure people with the genetic disorder lipoprotein lipase (LPL) deficiency. The drug is a no-brainer for patients and for healthcare providers, because the costs of treating patients long term so outweighs the cost of the cure. But, insurance providers are still looking at weighs to spread those costs over several years.

More of these so-called orphan drugs are in the pipeline, potentially a lot more. And the costs of developing these treatments, many of which are designed to cure rare genetic disorders is something that insurers and drug companies need to start negotiating right away so patients will have access as soon as they are available, according to Nature:

As gene therapies start to provide solutions for highly penetrant genetic diseases that had been intractable, the hand-wringing over their value and how government and private insurers around the globe will pay for them will likely beginโ€ฆ So far, pricing discussions for gene therapy has remained โ€œunder the radarโ€ for many payers in the US, says Troyen Brennan [pharmacy benefit manager at CVS Caremark]. โ€œIโ€™ve not seen the national health insurers talking much about this, but they will be sooner or later.โ€

How consumers and insurers will evaluate benefits and costs of these gene therapies will likely be an opaque and internal process as it is with other drugs. But there are many rare diseases with fairly straight forward genetic mutations at their root. We are rapidly moving toward the ability to cure them.

Additional Resources

Meredith Knight is editor of the human genetics section for Genetic Literacy Project and a freelance science and health writer in Austin, Texas. Follow her @meremereknight.

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT Image Jun 3, 2026, 03_14_43 PM
Viewpoint: How Earthjustice became the poster child for the abuse of special interest activist funding
ChatGPT Image Jun 3, 2026, 03_54_37 PM
Viewpoint: โ€œTurn on, tune in, drop outโ€โ€”Kennedy embraces the Timothy Leary psychedelic revolution
Screenshot-2026-06-05-at-2.12.30-PM
Some plants can poison you. So how did humans figure out what is safe to eat?
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpointโ€”โ€œMiracle moleculeโ€ debunked: Why acemannan supplements donโ€™t work
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-11-2026-01_15_03-PM
Selective Pressure, Selective Silence
Screenshot 2026-05-26 at 10.15
Viewpoint: Double standardโ€”Why does the wellness industry get a free pass while Big Healthcare is treated as morally suspect?
ChatGPT Image Jun 1, 2026, 11_39_17 AM
Viewpoint: When food myths go viral, farmers pay the price
ChatGPT Image May 28, 2026, 08_16_38 PM
Viewpoint: Why the EPA mismeasures cancer risk of chemicals and what should be done to fix it
ChatGPT Image May 26, 2026, 08_42_17 AM (1)
Viewpoint: Greenpeace and poison: How environmental advocacy groups rely on compliant (and often ignorant) journalists to spread disinformation and spark litigation
Picture1
Sounds we canโ€™t hear โ€” the hidden planetary signals behind science, fear, and misinformation

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.