Mom: ‘I’d never buy organics because I’m afraid there are dangerous pesticides on conventional produce’

YOU NEED TO SAY IN AN EDITOR’S NOTE WHO THIS ‘MOM’ IS

When my son was a baby, organic was a synonym for edible. If the apples I found at the grocery store weren’t certified, I wasn’t buying them. I knew that conventional produce could harbor traces of pesticides, and I’d read that pesticides could affect brain development. Sure, the details of this association were hazy. But in a way, it didn’t matter: Shelling out a bit more cash to minimize the risks, whatever they were, seemed worth it to me.

Fast-forward two years and my son is eating conventional strawberries for breakfast. I support the principles of organic farming, for sure, but it can be hard to consistently pay $7 for a pint of something he’ll go through in two days. Plus, I can’t help but wonder whether giving my son organic food really makes a difference to his health, considering that he’s been known to lick the bottom of his shoes, kiss my poop-sniffing dog, and eat crackers—someone else’s—off of the preschool floor.

Instead of continuing to wonder, I decided to dig into the literature and talk to toxicologists, horticulturists, risk experts, and nutritionists to find out whether the chemicals in conventionally farmed foods could truly pose a risk to my child. What I’ve discovered has totally surprised me—let’s just say I’m going to be a little more relaxed about what I serve kid No. 2.

I want to start off by saying that this column is not about whether organic agriculture is worth supporting for its environmental benefits (I think it is) or whether we as a society should care about the chemicals found in our foods and household products (I think we should). This column is about whether it’s worth buying organic produce for your kids specifically because you think the pesticides on conventional produce could harm them.

Read full original article: Organic Shmorganic

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-09-10-at-11.50.46-AM
Did COVID vaccines kill 2,500 service members? RFK Jr. hires an investigator who compares vaccine promoters to Nazi doctors
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-13-2026-10_24_17-AM
Bayer urges court to approve $7.25 billion Monsanto Roundup settlement that could limit its future liabilities
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-15-2026-06_05_13-PM
CRISPR fine-tuning unlocks vitamin C-rich potatoes without yield loss
Screenshot-2026-09-10-at-12.20.19-PM
'Jet fuel didn't melt the steel': 9/11 conspiracy theories debunked
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-15-2026-05_59_18-PM
RFK Jr. spent two years distancing himself from Children’s Health Defense. Now he’s keynoting its anti-vaccine DC conference.
ChatGPT-Image-Aug-28-2026-03_33_46-PM
Viewpoint: Bad science—Five bogus Trump administration claims about vaccines and autism
Screenshot-2026-09-11-at-2.26.23-PM
Newly approved GMO chestnut trees planted across from the White House are stirring debate
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-2-2026-10_30_14-PM
Zero: That is the official American measles death toll for 2026. Here is what RFK Jr.’s CDC leaves out.
Screenshot-2026-09-14-at-10.52.30-AM
AI is being used in dangerous bioscience experiments
screenshot at  am
‘Glyphosate is not carcinogenic’: Independent EU chemical oversight agency reaffirms—for the 3rd time in 9 years—that the herbicide is safe-as-used
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-14-2026-11_36_25-AM
How the reckless AI race among Anthropic, OpenAI and China spawned today’s safety crisis
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.