‘Social’ egg freezing raising concerns over women’s health and safety

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis. 

Women in their late 30s and in their 40s are being given false hope that freezing their eggs gives them a good chance of having children, according to leading fertility experts.

The concerns come as thousands of women are believed to be considering “social freezing” – having eggs frozen for non-medical reasons as they grapple with declining fertility that could wreck any hope of a family later in life.

Some women going through the freezing, thawing and implantation process can pay as much as £15,000, with clinics claiming up to a 60% pregnancy rate. But a growing number of experts are becoming concerned that the regulator, the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, isn’t doing enough to make it clear to women what their chances are of success really are.

Melanie Davies, an NHS fertility expert at University College London hospital, said: “10 years ago this was an experimental treatment, but as technology has advanced, egg freezing has now become routine. But women are still in the dark on success rates – over the next two years UK data should finally be coming out. Clinics and the regulator should make this available to help women make informed decisions.”

Soaring numbers of women are having eggs frozen for “social” reasons, some into their 40s. The number of eggs frozen in fertility clinics a year has almost tripled in recent years, according to latest figures from the HFEA. In 2008 there were 2,476 eggs frozen, rising to 7,047 in 2013, with the figure expected to have shot up since.

Read full, original post: Women ‘are being given false hope’ over freezing eggs

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-05-01-at-11.56.24-AM
‘Science moves forward when people are willing to think differently’: Memories of DNA maverick Craig Venter
Screenshot-2026-04-03-at-11.15.51-AM
Paraben panic: How a flawed study, media hype, and chemophobia convinced the public of the danger of one of the safest classes of preservatives
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-30-2026-12_21_05-PM-2
The tech billionaires behind the immortality movement
79d03212-2508-45d0-b427-8e9743ff6432
Viewpoint: The Casey Means hustle—Wellness woo opportunism dressed up as medical wisdom
Screenshot-PM-24
Viewpoint: The herbicide glyphosate isn’t perfect. Banning it would be far worse.
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-27-2026-11_27_05-AM
The myths of “process”: What science says about the “dangers’ of synthetic products and ultra-processed foods
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-3-2026-01_17_14-PM
MAHA wellness influencers deride proven anxiety medications, tout lifestyle fixes
Drinking lots of water can help reduce the effects of aging
Nanoplastics in drinking water: MAHA activists forge science-based bipartisan coalition 
ChatGPT-Image-May-1-2026-03_16_32-PM
Viewpoint: How ‘health care guru’ Joe Rogan circumvented the FDA’s skepticism on psychedelics
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-30-2026-05_00_48-PM
Wellness grifter physician turned wellness influencer out as surgeon general nominee
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.