Genetic test for breast cancer could mislead women to take drastic action

breast cancer istock xsmall

A few years ago, my mother called with an urgent request…She wanted me to get tested…I immediately said no.

BRCA1 and 2 are some of the most powerful cancer markers scientists have discovered…When I got that call from my mom, though, I shut her down. Because while BRCA is a powerful tool to estimate risk, it’s not a crystal ball.

So let’s say I did. If I tested positive, the statistics would push me toward removing my breasts and ovaries. Data suggests that surgery can increase survival in people with confirmed BRCA mutations.

There’s a problem with those rates, though: They’re largely based on families with a history of breast and ovarian cancer. The rates might not apply to other women.

Humans just can’t manage fear…Patients are petrified. Then they take drastic, potentially harmful—and sometimes unnecessary—action.

Genetic tests could mislead patients in the same way. The torrent of information buried in…our chromosomes will become more and more powerful, but it will never provide simple answers.

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis. Read full, original post: Why I Won’t Get The Genetic Test For Breast Cancer

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.noReviewsLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Jul-22-2026-09_13_07-AM
Viewpoint—The Strategic Litigation boom: Understanding the tightening coalition among NGOs, foundations, journalists, and tort lawyers
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
diversity
We are entering a new era of personalized medicine—if you’re white
How to Include More Strawberries in Your Diet
Strawberries are berries—and 35 other surprising food and drink myths
close up arabica coffee farmer s hands picking beans plant his farm colombia
Viewpoint: Why do so many ‘mainstream’ and ‘respected’ media outlets exaggerate climate change threats?
Screenshot-2026-07-07-at-12.55.44-PM
Viewpoint: Yes, we can adapt to a changing climate without devastating the environment and the economy
ChatGPT-Image-May-22-2026-10_26_09-AM
Trump-RFK, Jr. National Science Board firings: Accountability vs. partisan meddling
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
organic scaled
Facts & Fallacies podcast: Organic food cuts pesticide exposure? A response to Dr. Rhonda Patrick
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-6-2026-02_25_26-PM
40 million Americans take glucosamine. If you have memory loss, it could accelerate cognitive decline.
kratom
Viewpoint: Kratom ‘supplement’ crisis: DEA sits on its hands while patient addictions to this ineffective drug  rise

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.