Will gene editing promote ‘industrial farming’? Are there sustainable alternatives?

Screen Shot at AM

Editor’s Note: This article was written by two members of the International Panel of Experts on Sustainable Food Systems, an independent panel of transdisciplinary experts that supports, informs, and advises on international policy. 

As a new year dawns, it is hard not to be dazzled by the current pace of technological change in food and agriculture. Only last month, news emerged of a crop spray with the potential to increase the starch content in wheat grains, allowing for yield gains of up to 20%. This development comes hot on the heels of major breakthroughs in gene-editing technologies – using a powerful tool known as Crispr – over the course of 2016.

Recent crop-breeding innovations may be impressive, but they do not … [allow us] to move away from industrial monocultures and the inevitable damage and vulnerability they bring.

A viable alternative exists … [through] diversifying farms and farming landscapes – replacing synthetic chemical inputs, optimising biodiversity and stimulating interactions between different species, as part of holistic and regenerative strategies to build long-term soil fertility, healthy agro-ecosystems and secure livelihoods.

Too often, these arguments are dismissed as technophobia … [But] the growing body of evidence reviewed by the International Panel of Experts on Sustainable Food Systems (iPES-Food) shows the huge potential of these systems to succeed where industrial systems are failing – namely in reconciling concerns such as food security, environmental and livelihood resilience, nutritional adequacy and social equity.

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion, and analysis. Read full, original post: Modern agriculture cultivates climate change – we must nurture biodiversity

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Sep-2-2026-02_03_32-PM
AI data centers and water usage: It’s a genuine and growing problem
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-09-16-at-3.14.20-PM
19%: Plunging support for Trump-RFK, Jr. measles vaccine safety oversight
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-10-2026-01_44_53-PM
Viewpoint: Why medical and health nonsense spreads so casually on pop culture media
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-17-2026-12_28_43-PM
Vitamin D, omega-3 fish oil and glucosamine supplements could cause brain damage 
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-16-2026-11_28_54-AM
Viewpoint: Study links childhood vaccination to autism!!! Here’s how anti-vaxxers twist evidence to corrupt science
Screenshot-2026-09-16-at-2.26.42-PM
Viewpoint: How to ecologically damage America’s forests: Ban glyphosate
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-21-2026-10_18_59-AM-2
Viewpoint: Is corporate embrace of regenerative agriculture greenwashing?
Screenshot-2026-09-18-at-11.35.25-AM
RFK Jr.’s latest crank obsession: Protecting Americans from perfectly safe electromagnetic radiation
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-21-2026-10_55_04-AM
Viewpoint: America’s food-safety system is being methodically dismantled by the Trump administration.
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-17-2026-11_03_54-AM-2
AI sparks a bioweapons race
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.